citedby: 518979

1 - 8 of 8 (0.44 seconds)

Documents citing Dodla Bhaskar Rao vs State Bank Of India on 24 June, 1991

Muthoot Finance vs . Juggal Kishore Cc. No. 2770/12 on 30 August, 2012

33. Hon'ble Orissa High Court followed the abovesaid decision in Dodla Bhaskar Rao v. State Bank of India, AIR 1992 Orissa 161 to hold that a bank holding gold by way of collateral security and suing the borrower on the promissory note would get a decree conditional upon return of the gold to the borrower.

Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Saroj Kumar Taria vs Central Board Of Direct Taxes on 5 March, 2026

2. The respondents have filed their counter opposing and contesting the case of the applicant on the grounds that since the applicant is not a holder of civil post, OA filed by causal/daily wage employee before the Central Administrative Tribunal seeking direction to the respondents to regularize is not maintainable as held by the Hon'ble High Curt of Orissa in W.P(C) No. 4601/2003 in the case of Bhaskar Dora Vs UOI & Ors. The present case being one and the same, therefore, this Bench lacks RAVI KUMAR 2026.03.05 16:54:38 +05'30' 4 O.A.No. 260/00239 of 2025 jurisdiction to entertain this OA and this OA is liable to be dismissed on this ground. The applicant was not engaged through any process of selection or his engagement was again any sanctioned post.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Cuttack Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Pravat Suna vs Central Board Of Direct Taxes on 5 March, 2026

2. The respondents have filed their counter opposing and contesting the case of the applicant on the grounds that since the applicant is not a holder of civil post, OA filed by causal/daily wage employee before the Central Administrative Tribunal seeking direction to the respondents to regularize is not maintainable as held by the Hon'ble High Curt of Orissa in W.P(C) No. 4601/2003 in the case of Bhaskar Dora Vs UOI & Ors. The present case being one and the same, therefore, this Bench lacks RAVI KUMAR 2026.03.05 16:54:22 +05'30' 4 O.A.No. 260/00240 of 2025 jurisdiction to entertain this OA and this OA is liable to be dismissed on this ground. The applicant was not engaged through any process of selection or his engagement was again any sanctioned post.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Cuttack Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Hrusikesh Sahoo vs Central Board Of Direct Taxes on 5 March, 2026

2. The respondents have filed their counter opposing and contesting the case of the applicant on the grounds that since the applicant is not a holder of civil post, OA filed by causal/daily wage employee before the Central Administrative Tribunal seeking direction to the respondents to regularize is not maintainable as held by the Hon'ble High Curt of Orissa in W.P(C) No. 4601/2003 in the case of Bhaskar Dora Vs UOI & Ors. The present case being one and the same, therefore, this Bench lacks jurisdiction to entertain this OA and this OA is liable to be dismissed on this ground. The applicant was not engaged RAVI KUMAR 2026.03.05 16:53:59 +05'30' 4 O.A.No. 260/00241 of 2025 through any process of selection or his engagement was again any sanctioned post.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Cuttack Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Pitambar Sahoo vs Central Board Of Direct Taxes on 5 March, 2026

2. The respondents have filed their counter opposing and contesting the case of the applicant on the grounds that since the applicant is not a holder of civil post, OA filed by causal/daily wage employee before the Central Administrative Tribunal seeking direction to the respondents to regularize is not maintainable as held by the Hon'ble High Curt of Orissa in W.P(C) No. 4601/2003 in the case of Bhaskar Dora Vs UOI & Ors. The present case being one and the same, therefore, this Bench lacks RAVI KUMAR 2026.03.05 16:54:51 +05'30' 4 O.A.No. 260/00226 of 2025 jurisdiction to entertain this OA and this OA is liable to be dismissed on this ground. The applicant was not engaged through any process of selection or his engagement was again any sanctioned post.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Cuttack Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Janak Pradhan vs Central Board Of Direct Taxes on 5 March, 2026

2. The respondents have filed their counter opposing and contesting the case of the applicant on the grounds that since the applicant is not a holder of civil post, OA filed by causal/daily wage employee before the Central Administrative Tribunal seeking direction to the respondents to regularize is not maintainable as held by the Hon'ble High Curt of Orissa in W.P(C) No. 4601/2003 in the case of Bhaskar Dora Vs UOI & Ors. The present case being one and the same, therefore, this Bench lacks RAVI KUMAR 2026.03.05 16:55:08 +05'30' 4 O.A.No. 260/00225 of 2025 jurisdiction to entertain this OA and this OA is liable to be dismissed on this ground. The applicant was not engaged through any process of selection or his engagement was again any sanctioned post.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Cuttack Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar Behera vs Central Board Of Direct Taxes on 5 March, 2026

2. The respondents have filed their counter opposing and contesting the case of the applicant on the grounds that since the applicant is not a holder of civil post, OA filed by causal/daily wage employee before the Central Administrative Tribunal seeking direction to the respondents to regularize is not maintainable as held by the Hon'ble High Curt of Orissa in W.P(C) No. 4601/2003 in the case of Bhaskar Dora Vs UOI & Ors. The present case being one and the same, therefore, this Bench lacks jurisdiction to entertain this OA and this OA is liable to be dismissed on this ground. The applicant was not engaged through any process of selection or his engagement was again RAVI KUMAR 2026.03.05 16:55:20 +05'30' 4 O.A.No. 260/00012 of 2025 any sanctioned post.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Cuttack Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Pradyumna Dehury vs Central Board Of Direct Taxes on 25 March, 2026

2. The respondents have filed their counter opposing and contesting the case of the applicant on the grounds that since the applicant is not a holder of civil post, OA filed by causal/daily wage employee before the Central Administrative Tribunal seeking direction to the respondents to regularize is not maintainable as held by the Hon'ble High Curt of Orissa in W.P(C) No. 4601/2003 in the case of Bhaskar Dora Vs UOI & Ors. The present case being one and the same, therefore, this Bench lacks RAVI KUMAR 2026.03.25 10:08:15 +05'30' 4 O.A.No. 260/000440 of 2025 jurisdiction to entertain this OA and this OA is liable to be dismissed on this ground. The applicant was not engaged through any process of selection or his engagement was again any sanctioned post. The applicant was engaged on casual basis from 05.09.2000 and was receiving wages under head wages on continuous basis frm the office of the PCIT, Sambalpur upto 30.11.2021 and has been receiving wages from the office of the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Verification Unit)-1(2), Cuttack from 01.12.2021 till date.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Cuttack Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

1