Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.38 seconds)

Hira Lal Chaudhary And Ors. vs State on 7 March, 1956

On the other hand the cases which were approved were the cases that took the other view, that the offence of criminal breach of trust is complete as soon as there is misappropriation and there is no question of any loss to complainant being a part of the offence, and, therefore, Section179 did not apply at all. They were Babu Lal v. Ghansham Das, 5 All 333 (O), Ganeshi Lal v. Nand Kishore, 34 All 487 (P), Behari Lal v. Gangadin.
Allahabad High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Hira Lal Chaudhary And Ors. vs State on 7 March, 1956

On the other hand the cases which were approved were the cases that took the other view, that the offence of criminal breach of trust is complete as soon as there is misappropriation and there is no question of any loss to complainant being a part of the offence, and, therefore, Section 179 did not apply at all. They were Babu Lal v. Ghansham Das, 5 All 333 (O), Ganeshi Lal v. Nand Kishore 34 All 487 (P), Behari Lal v. Gangadin 1927 All 69 AIR V 14 (O) and Jagannath v. Emperor 1934 All 127 AIR V 21 (R).
Allahabad High Court Cites 53 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1