Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.79 seconds)
Documents citing Daya Wati Diwan Singh Shukla, Sarasvati ... vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 12 July, 2023

Shailendra Pratap Singh vs Board Of Revenue And 6 Ors. on 25 July, 2023

5. Learned counsel for the State relying upon the judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 12.07.2023 passed in Writ B No. 2426 of 2023 (Daya Wati Diwan Singh Shukla, Sarasvati Vidya Mandir, Inter College and Another vs. State of U.P. And 4 Others), that it is a settled preposition of law that if there is any dispute with regard to the title and more particularly when mutation entry is sought to be made on the basis of Will, party who is claiming title/right on the basis of the Will has to approach appropriate Civil Court and get his right and only thereafter on the basis of the decision of the Civil Court, necessary mutation entry can be made. Mutation of property in revenue records neither creates nor extinguishes title to the property nor has any presumptive value on the title. Such entry are relevant only for the purpose of collecting land revenue.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Pyare Yadav vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home), ... on 6 December, 2023

In support of his arguments, learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court in para -15 of Pritam Singh and another Vs. The State of Punjab reported in AIR 1956 Supreme Court 415 and the judgments of this Court in the case of Diwan Singh Vs. The State reported in 1966 Crl.L.J. 2, Mahir Husain Vs. State of U.P. and another passed in Application U/S 482 No.18857 of 2020 and Faruk @ Gaffar Vs. State of U.P. passed Criminal Appeal U/S 374 Cr.P.C. No. 98 of 2008.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1