Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.26 seconds)

Sri.R.Srinivas vs Sri.Eshwarappa.B.M on 5 February, 2022

18. The next Judgment relied by petitioners is New India Assurance Co vs Annappa Laxman Karamoshi and others of Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka and it is contended that the employee while returning to home went to temple and met with accident and in that case also it is considered as arising out and in the course of employment. It is to be Noticed that it is true that the return journey from (SCCH­3) 12 ECA 131/19 employment is considered as during the course of employment, but in this case the facts are different. There was no employment entrusted to say that while returning met with accident. Hence in my opinion this decision is also not helpful to petitioners.
Bangalore District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Divisional Manager vs Gurushantagouda S/O Ninganagouda on 20 November, 2018

In order to substantiate the said fact, he relied upon the decision in :6: the case of New India Assurance Company Limited, Bangalore vs. Annappa Laxman Karamoshi reported in Laws (Kar) 2003 9 64. He further submitted that the doctrine of notional extension of the work is applicable to the present facts of the case on hand. If the said doctrine is extended, then the deceased was an employee of the 3rd respondent and accident occurred during the course of employment. As such, the insurer is liable to pay the compensation. On these grounds, he prayed to dismiss the appeal.
Karnataka High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1