Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.34 seconds)
Documents citing J.R. Sharma Overseas Ltd. vs Abner Pharmaceuticals Ltd. on 12 January, 2005

Raghubir Singh & Ors vs Hans Raj on 11 July, 2014

In M/s J.R. Sharma case (supra) at Serial No. 6, the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi did not find admissions due to several disputed question of fact as discussed in the said case law itself and therefore decree on the basis of admission was declined. However, the said authority was on its own facts and due to disputed question of fact, the plaintiff was not held entitled to decree on the basis of admission.
Delhi District Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Swaranjit Singh Sayal vs M.K Jain on 30 November, 2023

26. I have also considered the decision in J.R. Sharma Overseas Ltd. (Supra) but find that the same is not applicable to the facts of the present case. It can, therefore, not be said that merely because the plaintiff has raised a claim for interest on the sum of Rs.3 crores, the suit would not be maintainable under Order XXXVII CPC. However, taking into account the current market rate of interest and the rates of interest charged by different banks, the plaintiff's claim for interest @18% per annum cannot be accepted. Considering the fact that the plaintiff has been deprived of this amount since the year 2012, I am of the view that interest of justice will be Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CS(OS) 3980/2014 Page 15 of 16 By:GARIMA MADAN Signing Date:01.12.2023 15:41:27 met by directing that the plaintiff would be entitled to interest @10% per annum with effect from 06.01.2012, when the defendant had received the entire sum of Rs.3 crores from the plaintiff.
Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - R Palli - Full Document
1