Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 271 (1.18 seconds)
Documents citing Kewal Krishan Puri & Anr vs State Of Punjab & Others on 4 May, 1979

Krishan vs State on 1 April, 2022

13. I have seen the cross-examination of complainant. It was suggested to her that accused persons had attacked/misbehaved with her due to previous confrontation. This bizarre suggestion lays bare the stance of the accused persons. It clearly implies that not only accused admit that they were very much present at the spot, they also admit that CA No. 214/2020 Krishan Vs. State CA No. 215/2020 Kamal Vs. State Page 6 of 15 they attacked/misbehaved with her. Of course, they claim that they did so on account of previous hostility. Mere fact that there was previous rivalry between the parties would not supply any reason to anyone to take law into one's own hands and to attack or misbehave with other. Faced with the aforesaid suggestion put by the defence, minor contradictions appearing on record, would not gather any real mass. Undoutedly, defence can take alternate pleas but the aforesaid suggestion put to the complainant is absolutely unambiguous and goes on to indicate that accused persons have no qualm with respect to their presence at the spot and also about the fact that they had hit the complainant and misbehaved with her.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

I.T.C. Ltd. Etc vs State Of Karnataka & Ors on 3 May, 1985

I am not persuaded to accept the argument that the facts of the present case are fully covered by the decision of this Court in Kewal Krishan Puri & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.(1) That case must be read in the light of the peculiar facts before the Court. I do not consider this to be an authority for all times to levy a fee of Rs. 2 or Re. 1 per 100 in all cases irrespective of the merits of the case. The problem of marketing in a developing country like ours has assumed very large proportions and the market fees are required to provide excellent facilities for extension, expansion and development of markets. In doing so, the Government can construct roads by converting rural roads into tarred ones in order to provide all possible convenience to the purchasers and boost up the sales.
Supreme Court of India Cites 92 - Cited by 161 - S M Ali - Full Document

Sri Vijaya Cotton Traders And Ors. vs State Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors. on 13 March, 1981

It may be that in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in Kewal Krishan v. State of Punjab, some of the observations in the judgment In I. R. Sons v. State, may be considered to be too wide; but we do not find anything in the judgment of the Supreme Court which is contrary to the view expressed by the division bench, that the services to be rendered and the facilities to be provided by the Market Committee extend throughout the notified market area without being confined to the Market area,
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 31 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Sona Chandi Oal Committee And Ors. vs State Of Maharashtra on 23 August, 2002

In. Amar Nath Om Parkash and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors., also the Apex Court has expressed agreement that the observations contained in Kewal Krishan Case (supra) about the extent of fees levied and realised to be spent for justifying quid pro quo are not to be read as Euclid's theorems nor as provisions of a statute and that the observations must be read in the context in which they appear.
Bombay High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - R K Batta - Full Document

Peerless General Finance And ... vs Reserve Bank Of India And Ors. on 3 May, 1995

293. The observation in Kewal Krishan Puri v. State of Punjab, , that the benefit should not be indirect and remote was not made in connection with any delayed benefit from the point of view of time, but, with reference to the very benefit itself and its connection with the levy, and, therefore, cannot be relied upon in the present context. Judgments of courts are not to be construed as Acts of Parliament. Nor can a judgment on a particular aspect of a question be read as a holy book covering all aspects of every question whether such questions and facets of such questions arose for consideration or not in that case.
Calcutta High Court Cites 91 - Cited by 82 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next