Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (1.85 seconds)
Documents citing C.Chellaswamy vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 10 July, 2019

The State Of Tamil Nadu vs Chinna Karuppaiah on 19 November, 2019

Therefore, in our considered view, the decision in the case of C.Chellaswamy and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others in W.P(MD)Nos.3496 to 3498 of 2015, dated 10.07.2019 , rejecting the prayer sought for in the writ petition does not lay down the correct legal principles. More so, in the light of the earlier decisions of the http://www.judis.nic.in 9/11 W.A.(MD)Nos.1254 & 1255/ 2019 Honourable Division Benches as pointed out by us earlier, mere reference of Rule 3 of the Conduct Rules, which grants permission for part-time village servants to take up part-time work or occupation, will not term all the employments as part-time employments. Furthermore, the Government had taken into consideration the nature of working conditions and then took a policy decision to bring them into regular time scale of pay. Thus, considering all these factors, we are of the view that the order passed in the writ petitions does not call for any interference.
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - T S Sivagnanam - Full Document

P.Senthurpandian vs The Principal Accountant General (A&E) ... on 1 October, 2020

Therefore, in our considered view, the decision in the case of C.Chellaswamy and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others in W.P(MD)Nos.3496 to 3498 of 2015, dated 10.07.2019 , rejecting the prayer sought for in the writ petition does not lay down the correct legal http://www.judis.nic.in 6/11 W.P.(MD)No.13209 of 2020 principles. More so, in the light of the earlier decisions of the Honourable Division Benches as pointed out by us earlier, mere reference of Rule 3 of the Conduct Rules, which grants permission for part-time village servants to take up part-time work or occupation, will not term all the employments as part-time employments. Furthermore, the Government had taken into consideration the nature of working conditions and then took a policy decision to bring them into regular time scale of pay. Thus, considering all these factors, we are of the view that the order passed in the writ petitions does not call for any interference.
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - R S Kumar - Full Document

A.Alagiri vs The Accountant General (A&E) Tamil Nadu on 13 October, 2020

Therefore, in our considered view, the decision in the case of C.Chellaswamy and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others in W.P(MD)Nos.3496 to 3498 of 2015, dated 10.07.2019, rejecting the prayer sought for in the writ petition does not lay down the correct legal principles. More so, in the light of the earlier decisions of the Honourable Division Benches as pointed out by us earlier, mere reference of Rule 3 of the Conduct Rules, which grants permission for part-time village servants to take up part-time work or occupation, will not term all the employments as part-time employments. Furthermore, the Government had taken into consideration the nature of working conditions and then took a policy decision to bring them into regular time scale of pay.
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

R.Karuppiah vs The Accountant General (A&E) Tamil Nadu on 13 October, 2020

Therefore, in our considered view, the decision in the case of C.Chellaswamy and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others in W.P(MD)Nos.3496 to 3498 of 2015, dated 10.07.2019, rejecting the prayer sought for in the writ petition does not lay down the correct legal principles. More so, in the light of the earlier decisions of the Honourable Division Benches as pointed out by us earlier, mere reference of Rule 3 of the Conduct Rules, which grants permission for part-time village servants to take up part-time work or occupation, will not term all the employments as part-time employments. Furthermore, the Government had taken into consideration the nature of working conditions and then took a policy decision to bring them into regular time scale of pay.
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

M.Alaguthai vs The Accountant General (A&E) Tamil Nadu on 13 October, 2020

Therefore, in our considered view, the decision in the case of C.Chellaswamy and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others in W.P(MD)Nos.3496 to 3498 of 2015, dated 10.07.2019, rejecting the prayer sought for in the writ petition does not lay down the correct legal principles. More so, in the light of the earlier decisions of the Honourable Division Benches as pointed out by us earlier, mere reference of Rule 3 of the Conduct Rules, which grants permission for part-time village servants to take up part-time work or occupation, will not term all the employments as part-time employments. Furthermore, the Government had taken into consideration the nature of working conditions and then took a policy decision to bring them into regular time scale of pay.
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document
1