Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 326 (1.90 seconds)
Documents citing Subramanya vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 October, 2022

Tarun Goel vs State Of U.P. on 4 July, 2024

(o) Counsel has next argued that as per the joint recovery/arrest memo, the police had prior information that the appellant is in possession of the articles. However, the source was not disclosed and secondly, no separate inquest report was prepared for the recovery of the articles. These currency notes and the jewellery in terms of Section 27A of the Evidence Act, 1872 and in view of the decision in Subramanya Vs. State of Karnataka (supra).
Allahabad High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dharmendra Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 30 January, 2024

12. As regards the confessional statement of the appellant Jitendra Chaudhary, so far as the same relates to his conviction, we find substance in the submissions advanced on his behalf that the trial court ought not to have exhibited the entire confessional statement rather could have marked as exhibit only such part of the said confession which could be said to have led to Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.702 of 2018 dt.30-01-2024 11/14 discovery of a fact. In the present case, it is the prosecution's case that disclosure of Jitendra Chaudhary led to recovery of the dead body of the deceased from a drain. It is manifest from the record that no panchnama was prepared at the place of occurrence after the alleged recovery of the dead body of the deceased. The confessional statement was not recorded by the police in presence of any independent witness. The Supreme court in case of Subramanya v. State of Karnataka (supra) has held in paragraph 84 as under:-
Patna High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Raju Kumar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 30 January, 2024

12. As regards the confessional statement of the appellant Jitendra Chaudhary, so far as the same relates to his conviction, we find substance in the submissions advanced on his behalf that the trial court ought not to have exhibited the entire confessional statement rather could have marked as exhibit only such part of the said confession which could be said to have led to Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.702 of 2018 dt.30-01-2024 11/14 discovery of a fact. In the present case, it is the prosecution's case that disclosure of Jitendra Chaudhary led to recovery of the dead body of the deceased from a drain. It is manifest from the record that no panchnama was prepared at the place of occurrence after the alleged recovery of the dead body of the deceased. The confessional statement was not recorded by the police in presence of any independent witness. The Supreme court in case of Subramanya v. State of Karnataka (supra) has held in paragraph 84 as under:-
Patna High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Jitendra Chaudhary @ Jitendra Kumar ... vs The State Of Bihar on 30 January, 2024

12. As regards the confessional statement of the appellant Jitendra Chaudhary, so far as the same relates to his conviction, we find substance in the submissions advanced on his behalf that the trial court ought not to have exhibited the entire confessional statement rather could have marked as exhibit only such part of the said confession which could be said to have led to Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.702 of 2018 dt.30-01-2024 11/14 discovery of a fact. In the present case, it is the prosecution's case that disclosure of Jitendra Chaudhary led to recovery of the dead body of the deceased from a drain. It is manifest from the record that no panchnama was prepared at the place of occurrence after the alleged recovery of the dead body of the deceased. The confessional statement was not recorded by the police in presence of any independent witness. The Supreme court in case of Subramanya v. State of Karnataka (supra) has held in paragraph 84 as under:-
Patna High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next