Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.31 seconds)

Mamta Ajmani & Ors. vs New Delhi Young Men Christian Assn. on 16 April, 2010

In that case the Commission itself had based its decision on the observations of the Supreme Court The proper method of computation is the multiplier method. Any departure, except in exceptional and extraordinary cases, would introduce inconsistency, of principle, lack of uniformity and an element of unpredictability for the assessment of compensation. Reliance was also placed on another decision of this Commission in a case of Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Vs Abdul Azeez IV ( 2007) CPJ 15 ( NC), in which a boy died in a swimming pool of Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad. In the said case, this Commission upheld the award of Rs.5,00,000/- as compensation awarded by the State Commission.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Sports Authority Of Andhra Pradesh ... vs D.V.Gopi Krishna Kurnool Dist And ... on 26 June, 2013

While we observe that there is negligence on behalf of the opposite parties, as the coach and the staff who are employees of the opposite parties did not event take minimum care and caution while dealing with young learners, we are of the considered view that the fact that the boy is their only child and a brilliant student and also that the parents lost the love and affection of their child can be considered for enhancement of the compensation. The National Commission in FA 385/2004 decided on 29-8-2007 has confirmed the order of this Commission in a similar case i.e. Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad V. Abdul Azeez reported in IV (2007) CPJ 15 NC in which this Commission had granted for the death of a boy in a swimming pool and wherein he was also a learner and the Municipal Corporation did not take proper caution and care when the boy drowned.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1