Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.45 seconds)
Documents citing Sk. Saifur Raheman & Others vs State Of Odisha & Others .... Opp. ... on 29 November, 2021

Dola Gobinda Pradhan & Others vs The Govt. Of Odisha & Others .... ... on 10 May, 2023

5. Learned Addl. Government Advocate, on the other hand // 3 // submitted that pursuant to the direction by this Court in the earlier ground of writ application, the Opposite Party No.1 to consider the case of the Petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order dated 31.05.2021 and accordingly the representation of the petitioner was rejected by the Opposite Party No.1. However, he further submitted that in the event, the Petitioners are covered by the judgment by this Court in Sk. Saifur Raheman's case (supra), then the Opposite Parties be directed to examine whether the Petitioner is covered by the ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgment and accordingly necessary orders be passed so far the present Petitioners are concerned.
Orissa High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Mohapatra - Full Document

Sunil Kumar Panigrahi vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ... on 17 July, 2023

5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on the other // 3 // hand submitted that pursuant to the direction of this Court in the earlier Writ Petition, the Opposite Party No.1 was directed to consider the case of the Petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order dated 31.05.2021 and accordingly the representation of the Petitioner was rejected by the Opposite Party No.1. However, he further submitted that in the event the Petitioner is covered by the judgment of this Court in Sk.Saifur Raheman's case (supra), then the Opposite Parties be directed to examine whether the Petitioner is covered by the ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgment and accordingly necessary orders be passed so far the present Petitioner is concerned.
Orissa High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Mohapatra - Full Document

Kailash Chandra Behera vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ... on 17 July, 2023

5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on the other // 3 // hand submitted that pursuant to the direction of this Court in the earlier Writ Petition, the Opposite Party No.1 was directed to consider the case of the Petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order dated 31.05.2021 and accordingly the representation of the Petitioner was rejected by the Opposite Party No.1. However, he further submitted that in the event the Petitioner is covered by the judgment of this Court in Sk.Saifur Raheman's case (supra), then the Opposite Parties be directed to examine whether the Petitioner is covered by the ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgment and accordingly necessary orders be passed so far the present Petitioner is concerned.
Orissa High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Mohapatra - Full Document

B.Chelmaya vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ... on 17 July, 2023

5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on the other // 3 // hand submitted that pursuant to the direction of this Court in the earlier Writ Petition, the Opposite Party No.1 was directed to consider the case of the Petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order dated 31.05.2021 and accordingly the representation of the Petitioner was rejected by the Opposite Party No.1. However, he further submitted that in the event the Petitioner is covered by the judgment of this Court in Sk.Saifur Raheman's case (supra), then the Opposite Parties be directed to examine whether the Petitioner is covered by the ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgment and accordingly necessary orders be passed so far the present Petitioner is concerned.
Orissa High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Mohapatra - Full Document

B.Lokanath Pattnaik vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ... on 17 July, 2023

5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on the other // 3 // hand submitted that pursuant to the direction of this Court in the earlier Writ Petition, the Opposite Party No.1 was directed to consider the case of the Petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order dated 31.05.2021 and accordingly the representation of the Petitioner was rejected by the Opposite Party No.1. However, he further submitted that in the event the Petitioner is covered by the judgment of this Court in Sk.Saifur Raheman's case (supra), then the Opposite Parties be directed to examine whether the Petitioner is covered by the ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgment and accordingly necessary orders be passed so far the present Petitioner is concerned.
Orissa High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Mohapatra - Full Document

Bhimasen Padhy vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ... on 17 July, 2023

5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on the other // 3 // hand submitted that pursuant to the direction of this Court in the earlier Writ Petition, the Opposite Party No.1 was directed to consider the case of the Petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order dated 31.05.2021 and accordingly the representation of the Petitioner was rejected by the Opposite Party No.1. However, he further submitted that in the event the Petitioner is covered by the judgment of this Court in Sk.Saifur Raheman's case (supra), then the Opposite Parties be directed to examine whether the Petitioner is covered by the ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgment and accordingly necessary orders be passed so far the present Petitioner is concerned.
Orissa High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Mohapatra - Full Document

Rabindra Kumar Pattanaik vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ... on 17 July, 2023

5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on the other // 3 // hand submitted that pursuant to the direction of this Court in the earlier Writ Petition, the Opposite Party No.1 was directed to consider the case of the Petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order dated 31.05.2021 and accordingly the representation of the Petitioner was rejected by the Opposite Party No.1. However, he further submitted that in the event the Petitioner is covered by the judgment of this Court in Sk.Saifur Raheman's case (supra), then the Opposite Parties be directed to examine whether the Petitioner is covered by the ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgment and accordingly necessary orders be passed so far the present Petitioner is concerned.
Orissa High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Mohapatra - Full Document

Babula Das vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ... on 17 July, 2023

5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on the other // 3 // hand submitted that pursuant to the direction of this Court in the earlier Writ Petition, the Opposite Party No.1 was directed to consider the case of the Petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order dated 31.05.2021 and accordingly the representation of the Petitioner was rejected by the Opposite Party No.1. However, he further submitted that in the event the Petitioner is covered by the judgment of this Court in Sk.Saifur Raheman's case (supra), then the Opposite Parties be directed to examine whether the Petitioner is covered by the ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgment and accordingly necessary orders be passed so far the present Petitioner is concerned.
Orissa High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Mohapatra - Full Document

Sibaram Panda vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ... on 17 July, 2023

5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on the other // 3 // hand submitted that pursuant to the direction of this Court in the earlier Writ Petition, the Opposite Party No.1 was directed to consider the case of the Petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order dated 31.05.2021 and accordingly the representation of the Petitioner was rejected by the Opposite Party No.1. However, he further submitted that in the event the Petitioner is covered by the judgment of this Court in Sk.Saifur Raheman's case (supra), then the Opposite Parties be directed to examine whether the Petitioner is covered by the ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgment and accordingly necessary orders be passed so far the present Petitioner is concerned.
Orissa High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Mohapatra - Full Document

B.Adaya Patra vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ... on 17 July, 2023

5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on the other // 3 // hand submitted that pursuant to the direction of this Court in the earlier Writ Petition, the Opposite Party No.1 was directed to consider the case of the Petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order dated 31.05.2021 and accordingly the representation of the Petitioner was rejected by the Opposite Party No.1. However, he further submitted that in the event the Petitioner is covered by the judgment of this Court in Sk.Saifur Raheman's case (supra), then the Opposite Parties be directed to examine whether the Petitioner is covered by the ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgment and accordingly necessary orders be passed so far the present Petitioner is concerned.
Orissa High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Mohapatra - Full Document
1   2 3 Next