Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.42 seconds)
Documents citing Krishan Lal vs Mohd. Din And Others on 4 March, 1993

Dharamvir Singh Punjabi And Anr. vs Raghuvar And Anr. on 30 July, 1996

17. Learned counsel for the owner and driver of the vehicle placed reliance on the cases of Prabhuvati Sharma v. Brijmohan Parihar 1990 ACJ 399 (MP); New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Darshan Singh 1992 ACJ 533 (Delhi); Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dulari Devi 1995 ACJ 9 (Patna); and Krishan Lal v. Mohd. Din 1993 ACJ 907 (Delhi); on the point that the limited liability of the insurance company could not be inferred in view of the fact that a tractor was not a goods carrier or a passenger carrier. The question of liability in those cases was considered on the basis of the insurance policy and the facts raised in those cases are entirely different. In those cases the insurance policy was not taken into consideration and therefore limited liability could not be taken as pleaded by the insurance company. But in the present case, the insurance policy is filed on record which has been proved and the plea taken by the insurance company was legal that its liability is limited.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Bimla Devi And Anr. vs New India Assurance Co. Ltd. And Ors. on 7 April, 1995

5. The learned Counsel for the appellants has contended that the multiplier adopted by the Tribunal is on the lower side in view of the settled position of law in this regard by various judgments of this Court and the Supreme Court. To reiterate the proposition that the multiplier adopted in this case could not in any manner be less than 20 or 25 he has cited Krishan Lal v. Mohd, Din . The multiplier in similar facts was assessed at 20.
Delhi High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Shri Siri Chand Yadav vs Smt. Bhagwati Devi And Ors. on 4 September, 2006

In Krishan Lal's case(supra), it is clearly evident that the statement of the insured to the effect that his liability was unlimited remained unchallenged, unrebutted and uncontroverted on record. It was in these circumstances that copy of the policy placed on record by the Insurance Company was not relied upon by the Court to hold that the liability of the Insurance Company was limited in the absence of policy.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - R Bindal - Full Document
1