Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.41 seconds)

Mehsana District Cooperative Milk ... vs State Of Gujarat & 5 on 8 May, 2015

[12.0] In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, all  these petitions succeed. The impugned order dated 17.01.2015 passed  by the respondent No.4 in exercise of powers under Rule 3­A(9) of the  Gujarat   Specified   Cooperative   Societies   Election   to   Committee   Rules,  1982 is hereby quashed and set aside and it is held that the impugned  order passed by the respondent No.4 is beyond the scope and ambit of  the   powers   conferred   under   Rule   3­A(9)   of   the   Gujarat   Specified  Cooperative Societies Election to Committee Rules, 1982. It is also held  that there cannot be any reservation of seats beyond the number of seats  as provided under Section 74(1B)(i) of the Act, 1961, meaning thereby  there shall be one seat reserved for Schedule Caste or Schedule Tribe  and two seats reserved for women and if the bye­laws provide for one  seat reserved for small farmers and marginal farmersin that case there  can be one seat reserved for marginal / small farmers. It is also held that  while exercising the powers under Rule 3­A(9) of the Gujarat Specified  Page 64 of 66 67 of 69 C/SCA/1611/2015 CAV JUDGMENT Cooperative Societies Election to Committee Rules, 1982, the Collector  shall have power to pass an order of delimitation of constituencies and  provide   number   of   constituencies   equal   to   the   number   of   seats  (considering the number of seats provided under the bye­laws only). It is  also  observed   and   held   that   that   delimitation   of   constituencies   under  Rule   3­A   more   particularly   Rule   3­A(9)   of   the   Gujarat   Specified  Cooperative   Societies   Election   to   Committee   Rules,   1982   can   also   be  territory­wise;   delimitation   of   constituencies   can   be   based   upon   the  objects   and   activities   of   the   societies   for   the   classes   of   individual  members since each electorate is to represent the respective members of  a   particular   area   or   a   particular   class,   as   the   case   may.   That   while  exercising   the   powers   under   Rule   3­A(9)   of   the   Gujarat   Specified  Cooperative Societies Election to Committee Rules, 1982, the Collector  has no authority and/or jurisdiction to change and/or alter the number  of seats provided under the bye­laws and/or alter/change the allocation  of seats for the class or class of persons/societies. That while exercising  the   powers   under   Rule   3­A(9)   of   the   Gujarat   Specified   Cooperative  Societies Election to Committee Rules, 1982, the Collector would have  jurisdiction to provide the number of constituencies equal to the number  of seats (considering the number of seats as provided under the bye­laws  of the society only). It is also observed and held that while exercising the  powers under Rule 3­A(9) of the Gujarat Specified Cooperative Societies  Election to Committee Rules, 1982 of delimitation of constituencies and  providing the number of constituencies equal to the number of seats, the  Collector is required to consider the relevant bye­laws which are already  approved, however so long as such bye­laws are not in conflict with any  of   the   provisions   of   the   Act,   1961   and/or   the   Gujarat   Specified  Cooperative   Societies   Election   to   Committee   Rules,   1982.   It   is   also  observed and held that even while providing the reservation for women,  the constituency shall be as per the rotation, as provided under the bye­ Page 65 of 66 68 of 69 C/SCA/1611/2015 CAV JUDGMENT laws so that electorate of every constituency shall have a right to elect a  woman   candidate   rotation­wise.   The   impugned   decision   dated  17.01.2015 passed by the respondent No.4 not providing any reservation  for the marginal farmers which is provided under the bye­laws is also  hereby quashed and set aside. The impugned decision dated 17.01.2015  is also hereby quashed and set aside on the ground that it would create  unequal   representation   and   would   breach   and/or   violate   principle   of  One Man One Vote and/or equal representation. The respondent No.4 is  hereby   directed   to   pass   fresh   order   of   delimitation   of   constituencies  afresh   and   after   considering   the   observations   made   hereinabove,  However the same shall be completed within a period of four months  from today as the election of the members of the Managing Committee  of the petitioner - Milk Producers' Union which is due since May, 2014  can be held. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent in each of the  petitions, however there shall be no order as to costs.
Gujarat High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M R Shah - Full Document
1