Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 85 (1.12 seconds)
Documents citing Bhushan Uttam Khare vs Dean, B.J. Medical College And Ors on 28 January, 1992

Mohammed Omeer Farooquddin vs The State Of Telangana on 7 August, 2019

18. Though learned Standing Counsel relied on the judgments of Apex Court, the same cannot be made applicable to the facts and circumstances of the case. No doubt, this Court cannot go into the aspects regarding prescription of qualification for admission into courses. As this Court does not have expertise to deal with such matters and it is the 3rd respondent University, who can fix the same, as held by the Hon'ble Apex 24 ARR,J WP_39615_40752_2018 Court in Bhushan Uttam Khare v. Dean, B.J.Medical College (supra). But in this case, this Court has not undertaken such exercise, as such, the judgments relied on by the learned Standing Counsel are not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the case on hand.
Telangana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - A R Reddy - Full Document

Syeda Sana Fatima vs The State Of Telangana. on 7 August, 2019

18. Though learned Standing Counsel relied on the judgments of Apex Court, the same cannot be made applicable to the facts and circumstances of the case. No doubt, this Court cannot go into the aspects regarding prescription of qualification for admission into courses. As this Court does not have expertise to deal with such matters and it is the 3rd respondent University, who can fix the same, as held by the Hon'ble Apex 24 ARR,J WP_39615_40752_2018 Court in Bhushan Uttam Khare v. Dean, B.J.Medical College (supra). But in this case, this Court has not undertaken such exercise, as such, the judgments relied on by the learned Standing Counsel are not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the case on hand.
Telangana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - A R Reddy - Full Document

Kle Societys College Of Education vs National Council For Teacher Education ... on 17 April, 2023

"19. It is not advisable for courts to interfere with the functioning of the educational institutions, which have expertise in their field. It would be highly inappropriate to tinker with the decision of the educational bodies without realizing the pros and cons of the situation. There is no allegation of mala fide against the University or its officers. The Academic Ordinance is applicable uniformly to all the students. Any interference on the ground of one reason or the other would dilute the sanctity of the Academic Ordinance. The same is not permissible in exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution when the validity of the Ordinance remained unchallenged. Reliance can be placed on the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of The University of Mysore and Anr vs C. D. Govinda Rao and Anr, Maharashtra State Board Of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education vs Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth Etc., Bhushan Uttam Khare vs Dean, B.J. Medical College and Ors., Medical Council Of India vs Sarang and Ors. and U.P. Public Service Commission vs Rahul Singh."
Delhi High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Buddhabhushan Anand Londhe Another vs Union Of India & Ors. on 3 May, 2023

- 26 - Neutral Citation Number 2023:DHC:3121 is not permissible in exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution when the validity of the Ordinance remained unchallenged. Reliance can be placed on the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of The University of Mysore and Anr vs C. D. Govinda Rao and Anr, Maharashtra State Board Of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education vs Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth Etc., Bhushan Uttam Khare vs Dean, B.J. Medical College and Ors., Medical Council Of India vs Sarang and Ors. and U.P. Public Service Commission v. Rahul Singh."
Delhi High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 3 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Parvind vs All India Institute Of Medical Science ... on 25 March, 2021

15. Though the delay in conduct of the qualifying examination or declaration of result thereof, this time around may be attributable to the Covid-19 pandemic but it is not as if in the past there were no such delays; in the past also, individual universities/colleges have delayed conduct of examinations and declaration of result and which has cost its students further admissions and in none of the cases, was it ever held, to our remembrance, that for such reasons, the provisions of the prospectus would be given a go-bye and the Courts would intervene. Even otherwise, the interference by the Courts in academic matters, which are best left to be governed to the education bodies, has to be minimal and the Courts, by making orders, cannot interfere in the running of the educational institutions and academic courses. Reference in this regard may be made to Dr. J.P. Kulshrestha (Dr.) Vs. Chancellor, Allahabad University (1980) 3 SCC 418, Maharastra State Board of Secondary Education Vs. Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth (1984) 4 SCC 27, Bhushan Uttam Khare Vs. Dean, B.J. Medical College (1992) 2 SCC 220, All India Council for Technical Education Vs. Surinder Kumar Dhawan (2009) 11 SCC 726 and Basavaiah (Dr.) Vs. Dr. HL Ramesh (2010) 8 SCC 372. Already for the last nearly three months, the academic calendar of AIIMS has suffered for LPA 370/2020 & Connected Matters Page 7 of 8 Signature Not Verified Signed By:ASHWANI Signing Date:06.04.2021 12:24:17 the reason of interim orders in these proceedings and a year cannot be permitted to be wasted.
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R S Endlaw - Full Document

Shatarupa Bhattacharya vs All India Institute Of Medical Sciences ... on 25 March, 2021

15. Though the delay in conduct of the qualifying examination or declaration of result thereof, this time around may be attributable to the Covid-19 pandemic but it is not as if in the past there were no such delays; in the past also, individual universities/colleges have delayed conduct of examinations and declaration of result and which has cost its students further admissions and in none of the cases, was it ever held, to our remembrance, that for such reasons, the provisions of the prospectus would be given a go-bye and the Courts would intervene. Even otherwise, the interference by the Courts in academic matters, which are best left to be governed to the education bodies, has to be minimal and the Courts, by making orders, cannot interfere in the running of the educational institutions and academic courses. Reference in this regard may be made to Dr. J.P. Kulshrestha (Dr.) Vs. Chancellor, Allahabad University (1980) 3 SCC 418, Maharastra State Board of Secondary Education Vs. Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth (1984) 4 SCC 27, Bhushan Uttam Khare Vs. Dean, B.J. Medical College (1992) 2 SCC 220, All India Council for Technical Education Vs. Surinder Kumar Dhawan (2009) 11 SCC 726 and Basavaiah (Dr.) Vs. Dr. HL Ramesh (2010) 8 SCC 372. Already for the last nearly three months, the academic calendar of AIIMS has suffered for LPA 370/2020 & Connected Matters Page 7 of 8 Signature Not Verified Signed By:ASHWANI Signing Date:06.04.2021 12:24:17 the reason of interim orders in these proceedings and a year cannot be permitted to be wasted.
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R S Endlaw - Full Document

Smriti Arora vs All India Institute Of Medical Science & ... on 25 March, 2021

15. Though the delay in conduct of the qualifying examination or declaration of result thereof, this time around may be attributable to the Covid-19 pandemic but it is not as if in the past there were no such delays; in the past also, individual universities/colleges have delayed conduct of examinations and declaration of result and which has cost its students further admissions and in none of the cases, was it ever held, to our remembrance, that for such reasons, the provisions of the prospectus would be given a go-bye and the Courts would intervene. Even otherwise, the interference by the Courts in academic matters, which are best left to be governed to the education bodies, has to be minimal and the Courts, by making orders, cannot interfere in the running of the educational institutions and academic courses. Reference in this regard may be made to Dr. J.P. Kulshrestha (Dr.) Vs. Chancellor, Allahabad University (1980) 3 SCC 418, Maharastra State Board of Secondary Education Vs. Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth (1984) 4 SCC 27, Bhushan Uttam Khare Vs. Dean, B.J. Medical College (1992) 2 SCC 220, All India Council for Technical Education Vs. Surinder Kumar Dhawan (2009) 11 SCC 726 and Basavaiah (Dr.) Vs. Dr. HL Ramesh (2010) 8 SCC 372. Already for the last nearly three months, the academic calendar of AIIMS has suffered for LPA 370/2020 & Connected Matters Page 7 of 8 Signature Not Verified Signed By:ASHWANI Signing Date:06.04.2021 12:24:17 the reason of interim orders in these proceedings and a year cannot be permitted to be wasted.
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R S Endlaw - Full Document

Jayeshkumar Parsotambhai Vaghela vs State Of Gujarat on 22 July, 2021

69. A similar view has been expressed in several decisions of the Supreme Court e.g. Dr. Uma Kant vs. Dr. Bhika Lal Jain JT 1991 (4) SC 75 (para 9), Bhushan Uttam Khare vs. The Dean, B.J. Medical College and Ors. JT 1992 (1) SC 583 (para 8), Rajender Prasad Mathur vs. Karnataka University and Anr. AIR 1986 SC 1448 (para 7) : 1986 Supp SCC 740 (para 7); P.M. Bhargava and Ors. vs. U.G.C. and Anr., 2004 (6) SCC 661 (para 13); Chairman, J.andK.
Gujarat High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - B D Karia - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next