Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (1.43 seconds)

R.D.B. Builders Private Limited & Anr vs The State Of West Bengal & Others on 26 February, 2026

169. Similarly, in Deptt. of Customs v. Sharad Gandhi, a two-Judge Bench of this Court considered a case where the respondent had been discharged of offences under Sections 132 and 175 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate allowed an application for discharge holding that there was a complete bar with regard to prosecution under the Customs Act, 1962, and that the Collector of Customs only had the power to confiscate the goods and impose a penalty for a breach of Section 3 of the Antiquities and Art Treasurers Act, 1972. Amongst other issues, the Bench had to interpret the meaning of Section 30 of the Antiquities and Art Treasurers Act, 1972, which reads as follows:
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 110 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R.D.B. Builders Private Limited & Anr vs The State Of West Bengal & Others on 26 February, 2026

169. Similarly, in Deptt. of Customs v. Sharad Gandhi, a two-Judge Bench of this Court considered a case where the respondent had been discharged of offences under Sections 132 and 175 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate allowed an application for discharge holding that there was a complete bar with regard to prosecution under the Customs Act, 1962, and that the Collector of Customs only had the power to confiscate the goods and impose a penalty for a breach of Section 3 of the Antiquities and Art Treasurers Act, 1972. Amongst other issues, the Bench had to interpret the meaning of Section 30 of the Antiquities and Art Treasurers Act, 1972, which reads as follows:
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 110 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1