citedby: 53846104

Basant Singh vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 27 April, 2015

Accordingly, the present petition is also ordered to be dismissed in terms of the judgment rendered by me in CWP No. 3847 of 2015; Iqbal Mohammad Vs. State of Punjab and others; decided on 24.4.2015.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D Sibal - Full Document

Gurmeet Singh Randhawa vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 16 September, 2015

The judgment in Iqbal Mohammad's case (supra) was sought to be distinguished on the ground that the subsequent instructions dated 30.04.2015 had also come in, which were not the subject matter of consideration in the said case.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 2 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document

Pawan Kumar vs The Punjab State Cooperative Supply & ... on 12 February, 2016

The issue of right of extension has already been considered in the cases of Government employees, in CWP-3847- 2015 titled Iqbal Mohammad Vs. State of Punjab & others, decided on 24.04.2015 and CWP-3826-2015 titled Romesh Garg Vs. State of Punjab & others, of even date, wherein it has been held that extension in service is a mere concession and the same can be unilaterally withdrawn regarding employees who are facing disciplinary action for major penalty.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document

Tarsem Lal vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 12 February, 2016

The issue of right of extension has already been considered in the cases of Government employees, in CWP-3847- 2015 titled Iqbal Mohammad Vs. State of Punjab & others and CWP-3826-2015 titled Romesh Garg Vs. State of Punjab & others, decided on 24.04.2015, wherein it has been held that extension in service is a mere concession and the same can be unilaterally withdrawn regarding employees who are facing disciplinary action for major penalty.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document

Om Parkash vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 17 March, 2016

In CWP No.3826 of 2015 titled Romesh Garg Vs. State of Punjab & others and in CWP No.3847 of 2015 titled Iqbal Mohammad Vs. State of Punjab & others, decided on 24.04.2015, it has already been held so. The relevant part reads as under:-

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document

Ramesh Kumar Verma vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 20 January, 2016

In Civil Writ Petition Nos.3847 of 2015- Iqbal Mohammad Vs. State of Punjab and others and 3826 of 2015-Romesh Garg Vs. State of Punjab and others decided on 24.4.2015 it has already been held that extension in service is not a matter of right and the legal issue stands decided against the petitioner.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document

Des Raj vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 16 March, 2016

In the written statement filed by the two set of respondents, it has been averred that the inquiry report has been submitted by the Inquiry 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 21-03-2016 00:07:31 ::: CWP No. 2468 of 2016 2 Officer and the petitioner already stands retired on 31.01.2016. It is not disputed that there is no legal or vested right as such to seek extension as per the law laid down in CWP No.3847 of 2015 titled Iqbal Mohammad Vs. State of Punjab & others, decided on 24.04.2015, and CWP No.3826 of 2015 titled Romesh Garg Vs. State of Punjab & others decided on 24.04.2015.