Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.71 seconds)
Documents citing Eco Maritime Ventures Ltd vs Ing Bank Nv on 27 June, 2016

Transworld Ship Management Llc vs Roro Shaker 1 Imo No 7929102 on 15 October, 2018

69. The learned counsel for the plaintiff has relied upon the judgments in the cases of VSNL (supra) and more particularly, Paragraphs 13, 14 and 15, M.V. Sea Renown (supra) and more particularly, Paragraphs 9 and 14, Eco Maritime Ventures Ltd. (supra), more particularly, Paragraphs 4.20, 5.0 to 5.2, 5.7 and 5.10, M.V. Lucky Field (supra), more particularly, Paragraphs 9(A), 9(A)(vii), 19 to 22 and 26 and Socar Turkey Petrol Enerji Dagitim (supra), more particularly, Paragraphs 33, 35, 37 and 39, to buttress the argument that if there is a reasonably arguable prima facie case and if triable issues are there, the proper course is for the defendant to file a written statement and all issues can be decided at the trial.
Gujarat High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - R M Chhaya - Full Document

Interocean Ship Repairs Llc vs Roro Shaker 1(Imo No 7929102) on 15 October, 2018

69. The learned counsel for the plaintiff has relied upon the judgments in the cases of VSNL (supra) and more particularly, Paragraphs 13, 14 and 15, M.V. Sea Renown (supra) and more particularly, Paragraphs 9 and 14, Eco Maritime Ventures Ltd. (supra), more particularly, Paragraphs 4.20, 5.0 to 5.2, 5.7 and 5.10, M.V. Lucky Field (supra), more particularly, Paragraphs 9(A), 9(A)(vii), 19 to 22 and 26 and Socar Turkey Petrol Enerji Dagitim (supra), more particularly, Paragraphs 33, 35, 37 and 39, to buttress the argument that if there is a reasonably arguable prima facie case and if triable issues are there, the proper course is for the defendant to file a written statement and all issues can be decided at the trial.
Gujarat High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - R M Chhaya - Full Document

Dan Bunkering (Singapore) Pte Ltd vs Mv Silvia Glory (Imo 9622942 on 21 August, 2020

In the decision of Eco Maritime, the Apex Court had not made any change in the decision Page 90 of 97 Downloaded on : Wed Nov 04 00:49:06 IST 2020 C/AS/8/2019 IA JUDGMENT of the Division Bench of this Court and therefore, the findings of the Division Bench need to be regarded overlooking the ratio in the decision of Chrisomar Corporation, in view of distinct fact, also do not find favour with this Court which is mentioned herein above, is made amply clear in Eco Maritime's case. Therefore, for any contractual terms, the parties to whom the bunkers had been supplied, unless there is a privity of contract with the owner for bunker's supply, the maritime lien will not come into effect.
Gujarat High Court Cites 55 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document
1