Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.79 seconds)
Documents citing Mohmed Javid Abdulmutlib Pirzada vs State Of Gujarat on 12 April, 2022

The Sukhiyapuri Vibhag Fal And Sakbhaji ... vs State Of Gujarat on 17 May, 2023

Insofar as case of Daheda Group Seva Sahakari Mandli Limited (supra), it has been referred to and Page 18 of 19 Downloaded on : Wed May 17 21:11:11 IST 2023 C/SCA/6984/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 17/05/2023 relied upon by the Division bench of this Court in Mohamed Javid Abdulmutlib Pirzada (supra) while examining the availability of alternative and efficacious remedy.
Gujarat High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rathod Thakarshibhai Bhuraji vs State Of Gujarat on 21 August, 2023

ordinate Bench of this Court in case of Trivedi Arvindbhai hargovanbhai vs. State of Gujarat in Special Civil Application No. 10863 of 2020 and allied matters dated 25.09.2020 . Learned AGP would submit that the law laid down by the Full Bench has been followed and reiterated in the other decisions and whereas it is submitted that considering the same, this Court may not entertain the present writ petitions.
Gujarat High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - N Kariel - Full Document

The Chanchpur Arthsam Seva Sahakari ... vs State Of Gujarat on 3 May, 2023

14. Adverting now to the aspect of availability of alternative remedy, the Judgment of the Division Bench in the case of Mohmed Javid Abdulmutlib Pirzada (supra) is worth referring to. The Division Bench, pointed out that when statue has created remedy to redress grievance, it is always permissible for a person while invoking same to raise all permissible contentions in accordance with law. The Division Bench, did not interfere with the judgment of the learned single Judge which, dismissed the petition on the ground of availability of the alternative remedy. Relevant paragraphs 9 to 12, read thus:
Gujarat High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 1 - S K Vishen - Full Document

Chimanbhai Madhubhai Shekhra vs Director, Agricultural Marketing And ... on 26 October, 2023

She further relied upon the decision of this Court in the case of Mohmed Javid Abdulmutlib Pirzada v. State of Gujarat, rendered on 6.2.2023 in Letters Patent Appeal No.555 of 2022 and reiterated the submission that even as per the latest decision of Division Bench of this Court, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision taken by the Authorized Officer, the appropriate remedy would be to file an election petition under Rule 28 of the Rules and the present petition under extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be entertained.
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - N S Desai - Full Document
1