Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.30 seconds)

Md. Muqaddar Khan vs The State Of Bihar on 6 April, 2021

In case of Reena Rani v. State of Haryana, reported in (2012) 10 SCC 215, the Supreme Court relying on the decision in case of Tulsiram Patel (supra) interfered with the decision of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana and set aside an order of dismissal passed in exercise of power under Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution of India as in the order of dismissal, the disciplinary authority had not disclosed any reason as to why it was not reasonably practicable to hold regular departmental enquiry.
Patna High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Rajumiya Hanif Saiyed vs State Of Gujarat on 26 September, 2022

8. Recently, in Reena Rani v. State of Haryana, after referring to the various authorities in the field, the Court ruled that when reasons are not ascribed, the order is vitiated and accordingly set aside the order of dismissal which had been concurred with by the Single Judge and directed for reinstatement in service with all consequential benefits. It has also been observed therein that the order passed by this Court would not preclude the competent authority from taking action against the Appellant in accordance with law.
Gujarat High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - A J Desai - Full Document
1