Arjun Uppal & Anr vs Seth & Sons Pvt. Ltd. on 4 September, 2012
8. The learned counsel for the petitioners sought to assail the
impugned order alleging that much credence has been given by the
learned ARC to the project report submitted by the petitioner and
also on the requirement of taking permissions from the competent
authority under Section 6A of the Slums Areas (Improvement and
RCR 28/2012 Page 5 of 13
Clearance) Act. Relying upon D.L.Kamble Vs. ARM Kotkune,
AIR 1999 SC 2226, Tarsem Lal Vs. Pritam Dass Khullar, 2005
(2) RCR 215, Dilip Kumar Ghose Vs. Amit Kumar Roy, 2004 (1)
RCR 222, it was contended that the landlords need not even indicate
the nature of business which they intend to start in their premises
and need not even establish that they are having the technical know-
how necessary for doing the business and further that a tenant is not
required to give project report of the business that he intends to start.