Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.34 seconds)

Mahalingam vs Gurusamy on 8 November, 2019

In Thakur Ram Janki v. Jago Singh (AIR 1962 Pat 131) referred to above, an appeal was filed by some of the defendants against the decree. Two of the defendants, who did not file such appeal, died during the pendency of the said appeal. A Division Bench of the Patna High Court considered the question and held that whether they died before the filing of the appeal or after the filing of the appeal, it did not matter and the benefit of the decree which might be passed by the appellate court was available to the legal representatives of the deceased non-
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - R Subramanian - Full Document

Anandibai And Anr. vs Sundarabai on 12 September, 1962

Phulma, AIR 1961 Him Pra 10 decided by Capoor J. C. and the case of Thakur Ram Janki v. Jago Singh, AIR 1962 Pat 131 decided by a Division Bench, are all cases which follow the Supreme Court case of Gummalapura, AIR 1959 SC 577. The last one was a case of an alienation made by a limited owner by way of a permanent lease. The learned Judges held that there would be no distinction between a permanent lease and a temporary lease and the limited owner would still retain by way of right some property which will become her absolute estate, as per Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Tule Ram vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. [Along With ... on 30 November, 2006

learned Counsel also referred to the judgment of the Patna High Court in Thakur Ram Janki and Ors. v. Jago Singh and Ors. AIR 1962 Patna 131 wherein a Division Bench of the Patna High Court has observed that when a decree against the defendants proceeds on ground common to all the defendants, Order 41 Rule 4 of the said Code can be taken advantage of by the non appealing defendant, even where any of the non appealing defendants dies after the passing of the decree appealed from but before the filing of the appeal and his legal representatives are not brought on the record either as appellants or respondents or where any of the non appealing defendants dies after the filing of the appeal and during its pendency.
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - S K Kaul - Full Document
1