Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.45 seconds)
Documents citing Jamnadas Shankarlal And Vrijbhukhan ... vs Atmaram Harjivan on 11 July, 1877

Soudaminey Dossee vs Benode Coomaree Dossee on 14 February, 1889

A Bombay case was cited, which, it was contended, is inconsistent with this view of the law, Jamnadas Shankarlal v. Atmaram Harjivan I.L.R. 2 Bom. 138. There, under the circumstances of the case, a mandatory injunction was granted; but we cannot, I think, regard that case as laying down any broad rule that mandatory injunctions are to be granted as a matter of course; but it appears to me the law on this point is well settled.
Calcutta High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Athikarath Nanu Menon And Ors. vs Erathanikat Komu Nayar And Ors. on 11 August, 1897

The same principle has been acted upon by the Bombay High Court with reference to mandatory injunctions [Jamnadas Shankarial v. Atmaram Harjivan I.L.R. 2 Bom. 133. 'Examining the present case in the light of these observations, we find no adequate ground for holding that there was waiver or such conduct or neglect as would justify us in refusing the plaintiffs the declaration they are otherwise found to be entitled to, nor should it be overlooked that in this case the party through whom the defendants claim entered into the transaction with his eyes open and at his own risk, as he was aware of the arrangement by which his mortgagor's power was limited. He could, therefore, claim no indulgence.
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1