Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (1.03 seconds)
Documents citing Jagdish Kumar Lal Thr Lrs vs Govt Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 4 January, 2016

Gurmeet Singh And Ors vs N.D.M.C. And Anr on 29 August, 2016

12 In this case also, admittedly the original allottee Amin Chand had been granted a license which stood cancelled by the show cause notice dated 11.11.2011; since he had violated the terms of the license, that license had been cancelled. This judgment passed by the Single Judge was upheld by the Division Bench in LPA No.542/2015 titled Rajiv Narula Vs. Governments of NCT of Delhi and Others [including the case of Shanti Devi Vs. Governments of NCT of Delhi Thr Its Chief Secretary and others (LPA No.595/2015)] wherein before the Division Bench a re-argument on the policy dated 06.07.2011 was heard and decided in favour of the Corporation. The said order reads herein as under:-
Delhi High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - I Kaur - Full Document

Mohd. Suleman vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 May, 2023

Manoj Kumar Singh vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) in W.P. (CRL) 21/2023  Ram Sagar @ Sagar vs. State NCT of Delhi in W.P. (CRL) 748/2022 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KAMAL KANT MENDIRATTA W.P.(Crl) 279/2023 Page 2 of 6 Signing Date:25.05.2023 16:45:46 NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2023:DHC:3679  Surender alias Bhola vs. State of G.N.C.T. of Delhi in W.P. (CRL) 605/2022  Sultan @ Rajesh vs. State of GNCT of Delhi in W.P. (CRL)764/2022  Vinod @ Vinoda vs. The State (Govt of N.C.T. Delhi) in W.P. (CRL) 89/2023  Anil Kumar vs. State (GNCT of Delhi) in W.P. (CRL)
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R Bhatnagar - Full Document

Sh. Ravinder Singh vs Delhi Development Authority on 13 November, 2017

10. It is further stated that genesis of formulation of policy by the respondent No.3 was the LPA No. 240/2006 however the applicability of the policy cannot be determined in isolation but keeping in view the policy document dated 27.09.1966 of the respondent No.2 and rights of the parties crystallized under the said policy. The policy of the respondent No.3 is qua sanction of license whereas the policy document dated 27.09.1966 of the respondent No.2 relates to the regularization of the coal deport plot.  It is further stated that said LPA had arisen out of WP (C) No. 6827/1999 titled Sadhna Grover Vs. MCD & Ors wherein Smt.   Sadhna   Grover   claimed   that   in   1969,   Sh.   Madan   Lal Grover was alloted a plot measuring 200 Sq Yards on tehbazari at Rs. 20 per month for use as a coal depot and that her father in   law   expired   on   19.07.1979   and   thereafter   DDA   had demolished the structure built up on the said plot.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Nct Of Delhi vs Amit Sharma & Ors. on 4 July, 2018

In support of the above contentions, learned counsel for accused persons/respondents relied upon Shekhar and Anr. Versus The State of NCT of Delhi, 2008 (2) JCC 871; Ravinder Singh versus Govt. of NCT of Delhi, 2009 (1) JCC 91; Chatpal @ Satpal versus State, 2011 (123) DRJ 131 (DB); Mustkeem @ Sirajudeen versus State of Rajasthan, 2011 AIAR (Criminal) 667; Hira Lal versus State, 2011 (3) LRC 262 (Del) (DB); Surjit Singh and Anr versus State of Punjab, AIR 1994 SC 110; C.K. Raveendran vs. State of Kerala, 2000 Cri.LJ 497; Murlidhar & Ors vs. State of Rajasthan, 2005 AIAR (Criminal) 617; Jasmer Singh vs. State of Delhi, 2007 (4) JCC 2861; State of Punjab vs. Sarup Singh, 1998 (1) JCC (SC) 57; Babudas vs. State of M.P., 2003 Cri.LJ 2536; Order dated 08.11.2011, passed by Delhi High Court in Crl.
Delhi High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 4 - P S Teji - Full Document

Wg.Commander P.S.Binder Retd. vs D.D.A. on 28 March, 2024

40. The Coordinate Bench of this Court in Surender Singh Maan Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi reported in 2017 SCC Online Del 10194 had succinctly considered the effect of an affidavit as required under the Policy and the context in which the government had brought the 1961 Scheme into force. More particularly, the observations in para 12 and 13 would be pertinent and are extracted hereunder:-
Delhi High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - T R Gedela - Full Document
1   2 Next