Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 334 (1.39 seconds)

The State Of Jharkhand vs Birendra Pratap Singh on 11 June, 2024

23. However, after the aforesaid judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Purshottam Lal Das and Ors. vs. State of Bihar and Ors. (supra), the judgment has been rendered in State of Punjab and Ors. vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer) and Ors. (supra) clarifying the position that there cannot be any recovery if the concerned public servant is coming under the fold of parameters as under paragraph-18 thereof.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Musaddi Lal Garg vs Haryana Agro Industries Corporation ... on 26 February, 2014

vs. Government of India & Ors. (2006) 11 SCC 709; Purshottam Lal Das & Ors., vs. State of Bihar, [2006] 11 SCC 492; Punjab National Bank & Ors. Vs. Manjeet Singh & Anr., [2006] 8 SCC 647; and Sailesh ranjan 2014.03.10 10:03 Bihar State Electricity Board & Anr. Vs. Bijay Bahadur & Anr., I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.4307 of 2008 -5- [2000] 10 SCC 99.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document

Ashok Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 12 December, 2023

5. This Court finds that the law regarding recovery is no longer res integra and has been well settled in a catena of decisions reported in (2009) 3 SCC (Syed Qadir vs. State of Bihar); (1995) Suppl.1 SCC 80 (Sahib Ram vs. State of Haryana); (1994) 2 SCC 52 (Shyam Babu Verma vs. Union of India) ; (1997) 6 SCC 139 (B.Ganga Ram vs. Regional Joint Director) ; (2006) 11 SCC 492 (Purshottam Lal Das vs. State of Bihar) ; (2000) 10 SCC 99 (Bihar State Electricity Board vs. Bijay Bhadur); (2006) 11 SCC 7089 (B.J. Akkara vs. Government of India University) and (1995) suppl.
Patna High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - M K Shah - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next