citedby: 55537762

Katha Dubey Through Guardian/Father ... vs National Testing Agency Through Its ... on 27 June, 2025

21. It is also submitted that so far as the decision rendered by the Madras High Court in the case of S. Sai Priya (Supra) is concerned, it was only in respect of five petitions, and was confined to four centres only.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Abdullah Shaqaik vs National Testing Agency on 23 June, 2025

21. It is also submitted that so far as the decision rendered by the Madras High Court in the case of S. Sai Priya (Supra) is concerned, it was only in respect of five petitions, and was confined to four centres only.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Rahul Ahirwar vs National Testing Agency Through Its ... on 23 June, 2025

21. It is also submitted that so far as the decision rendered by the Madras High Court in the case of S. Sai Priya (Supra) is concerned, it was only in respect of five petitions, and was confined to four centres only.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Anjali Goud vs National Testing Agency on 23 June, 2025

21. It is also submitted that so far as the decision rendered by the Madras High Court in the case of S. Sai Priya (Supra) is concerned, it was only in respect of five petitions, and was confined to four centres only.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Divyanshi vs National Testing Agency on 23 June, 2025

21. It is also submitted that so far as the decision rendered by the Madras High Court in the case of S. Sai Priya (Supra) is concerned, it was only in respect of five petitions, and was confined to four centres only.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Ariana Through Natural Guardian Father ... vs National Testing Agency on 23 June, 2025

21. It is also submitted that so far as the decision rendered by the Madras High Court in the case of S. Sai Priya (Supra) is concerned, it was only in respect of five petitions, and was confined to four centres only.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Neha vs National Testging Agency on 23 June, 2025

21. It is also submitted that so far as the decision rendered by the Madras High Court in the case of S. Sai Priya (Supra) is concerned, it was only in respect of five petitions, and was confined to four centres only.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Jatin Patidar vs National Testing Agency on 23 June, 2025

21. It is also submitted that so far as the decision rendered by the Madras High Court in the case of S. Sai Priya (Supra) is concerned, it was only in respect of five petitions, and was confined to four centres only.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Rohit Singh vs National Testing Agency Through Its ... on 23 June, 2025

21. It is also submitted that so far as the decision rendered by the Madras High Court in the case of S. Sai Priya (Supra) is concerned, it was only in respect of five petitions, and was confined to four centres only.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Chanchal Verma vs National Testing Agency Through Its ... on 23 June, 2025

21. It is also submitted that so far as the decision rendered by the Madras High Court in the case of S. Sai Priya (Supra) is concerned, it was only in respect of five petitions, and was confined to four centres only.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results