Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.65 seconds)
Documents citing The Joint Registrar Of Co-Operative ... vs K.Ambarayan on 11 April, 2018

N.Ravi Chandran vs The Registrar Of Co-Operative ... on 26 July, 2021

“6. We are in agreement with the reasoning of the Writ Court that in the absence of an enabling statutory provision, it would not be permissible for the employer to withhold the terminal benefits of a retired employee. This view is fortified by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies vs. K.Ambarayan (Judgement dated 11.04.2018 in WA.Nos.663 and 668 of 2015), in which, one of us (K.K.Sasidharan,J) is a party. The eligible amount of terminal benefits shall be disbursed to the petitioner under written acknowledgement and a report of compliance shall be filed before the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court by 15.03.2019.”
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M S Ramesh - Full Document

A.Venkatachalam vs The Registrar Of Co-Operative ... on 26 July, 2021

“6. We are in agreement with the reasoning of the Writ Court that in the absence of an enabling statutory provision, it would not be permissible for the employer to withhold the terminal benefits of a retired employee. This view is fortified by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies vs. K.Ambarayan (Judgement dated 11.04.2018 in WA.Nos.663 and 668 of 2015), in which, one of us (K.K.Sasidharan,J) is a party.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - M S Ramesh - Full Document

R.Panneerselvam vs The Registrar Of Co-Operative on 26 July, 2021

“6. We are in agreement with the reasoning of the Writ Court that in the absence of an enabling statutory provision, it would not be permissible for the employer to withhold the terminal benefits of a retired employee. This view is fortified by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies vs. K.Ambarayan (Judgement dated 11.04.2018 in WA.Nos.663 and 668 of 2015), in which, one of us (K.K.Sasidharan,J) is a party. The eligible amount of terminal benefits shall be disbursed to the petitioner under written acknowledgement and a report of compliance shall be filed before the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court by 15.03.2019.”
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M S Ramesh - Full Document

(Society Contribution) vs The Registrar Of Co-Operative ... on 26 July, 2021

“6. We are in agreement with the reasoning of the Writ Court that in the absence of an enabling statutory provision, it would not be permissible for the employer to withhold the terminal benefits of a retired employee. This view is fortified by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies vs. K.Ambarayan (Judgement dated 11.04.2018 in WA.Nos.663 and 668 of 2015), in which, one of us (K.K.Sasidharan,J) is a party. The eligible amount of terminal benefits shall be disbursed to the petitioner under written acknowledgement and a report of compliance shall be filed before the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court by 15.03.2019.” https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M S Ramesh - Full Document

A.Venkatachalam vs The Registrar Of Co-Operative ... on 26 July, 2021

“6. We are in agreement with the reasoning of the Writ Court that in the absence of an enabling statutory provision, it would not be permissible for the employer to withhold the terminal benefits of a retired employee. This view is fortified by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Joint https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.38109 of 2016 Registrar of Co-operative Societies vs. K.Ambarayan (Judgement dated 11.04.2018 in WA.Nos.663 and 668 of 2015), in which, one of us (K.K.Sasidharan,J) is a party. The eligible amount of terminal benefits shall be disbursed to the petitioner under written acknowledgement and a report of compliance shall be filed before the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court by 15.03.2019.”
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - M S Ramesh - Full Document

V. Devarajan vs The Authority Under Payment Of Gratuity ... on 8 February, 2023

“6. We are in agreement with the reasoning of the Writ Court that in the absence of an enabling statutory provision, it would not be permissible for the employer to withhold the terminal benefits of a retired employee. This view is fortified by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies vs. K.Ambarayan (Judgement dated 11.04.2018 in WA.Nos.663 and 668 of 2015), in which, one of us (K.K.Sasidharan,J) is a party.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - M S Ramesh - Full Document

A. Radhakrishnan vs The Authority Under Payment Of Gratuity ... on 8 February, 2023

“6. We are in agreement with the reasoning of the Writ Court that in the absence of an enabling statutory provision, it would not be permissible for the employer to withhold the terminal benefits of a retired employee. This view is fortified by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies vs. K.Ambarayan (Judgement dated 11.04.2018 in WA.Nos.663 and 668 of 2015), in which, one of us (K.K.Sasidharan,J) is a party.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - M S Ramesh - Full Document

K. Murugan vs The Authority Under Payment Of Gratuity ... on 8 February, 2023

“6. We are in agreement with the reasoning of the Writ Court that in the absence of an enabling statutory provision, it would not be permissible for the employer to withhold the terminal benefits of a retired employee. This view is fortified by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies vs. K.Ambarayan (Judgement dated 11.04.2018 in WA.Nos.663 and 668 of 2015), in which, one of us (K.K.Sasidharan,J) is a party.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - M S Ramesh - Full Document
1