Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.58 seconds)
Documents citing M. Madhavan Pillai vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 1 February, 1965

Rafique And Sons And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 19 January, 1993

In view of the above decisions it is clear that the fixation of minimum wages of Bidi workers in the State of U.P. in the background of prevailing inflation and high prices should not be interfered with, particularly when the said decision has been taken only as a temporary measure to meet the emergent situation arising out in the State. No substantial ground has been made out by the petitioners for interfering with the aforesaid notification.
Allahabad High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Swaroopchand S/O Bacchraj Kothari And ... vs Leela W/O Ramsingh Suryanwanshi And ... on 10 July, 1990

7. In appreciating the contentions raised on behalf of the applicant, it is necessary to see that where an order is to be made for return of the property under section 452 Cr.P.C. after the accused is discharged or acquitted i.e. at the conclusion of the trial, the Court should normally restore the property which is produced before it or which is in its custody to the person from whose custody it was taken. Departure from this statutory rule of practice is not to be lightly made when there is no dispute or doubt that the property in question was seized from the custody of the accused and belonged to him. This is the view taken by the Supreme Court in the case of M. Madhavan v. State of Kerala, reported in 1979 Cr.L.J. 1197 upon the scope of section 517 of the old Code which is analogous to section 452 of the present Code.
Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1