Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.68 seconds)

Fir No.733/2020 (State vs . Dhamo) Ps Sagarpur on 4 August, 2023

"It therefore emerges that non-compliance of these provisions i.e. Sections 100 and 165 Cr.P.C. would amount to an irregularity and the effect of the same on the main case depends upon the facts and Page 11 of 18 FIR No.733/2020 (State vs. Dhamo) PS Sagarpur circumstances of each case. Of course, in such a situation, the court has to consider whether any prejudice has been caused to the accused and also examine the evidence in respect of search in the light of the fact that these provisions have not been complied with and further consider whether the weight of evidence is in any manner affected because of the non-compliance. It is well-settled that the testimony of a witness is not to be doubted or discarded merely on the ground that he happens to be an official but as a rule of caution and depending upon the circumstances of the case, the courts look for independent corroboration. This again depends on question whether the official has deliberately failed to comply with these provisions or failure was due to lack of time and opportunity to associate some independent witnesses with the search and strictly comply with these provisions."
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Dhamo on 16 January, 2025

In the case such as the present one, the fact of recovery, seizure, sampling and the chain of custody is of utmost importance to bring home the guilt of Page no. 7 / 13 FIR No.214/2018 (State vs. Dhamo) PS Sagarpur an accused. The case of the prosecution is that one white colour plastic katta containing 83 quarter bottles of illicit liquor with each such bottle having the label of 'Crazy Romeo Whisky for sale in Arunachal Pradesh only, 180 ml' were seized from the accused. Recovery of the alleged illicit liquor which the accused was supposedly in possession of, without a valid license, was effected, in a residential area and and the time of recovery was 09:45 PM, however no public person was made a witness to the said recovery. It is not disputed by the prosecution witnesses on whose testimony the prosecution seeks to rely, that at the time of recovery of the illicit liquor, there were members of general public available at the spot from where recovery was made, however it is both apparent and surprising that no independent witness was made to join the proceedings by the police.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dharmendra Pal And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 9 February, 2023

9. Subject to the above, the entire proceedings of Sessions Case No. 662 of 2020 (State Vs. Dharmendra Pal and Ors.), arising out of Case Crime No. 190 of 2019, under Sections - 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. & Section 3(1) Da, Dha of SC/ST Act, Police Station - Raksha, District Jhansi, pending in the court of Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Jhansi is quashed so far it relates to the present applicant.
Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - S D Singh - Full Document

Dharmendra Pal And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 1 July, 2022

By means of this application, the applicants have prayed for quashing the impugned charge-sheet dated 4.9.2016 along with cognizance order passed by Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, IInd, Kanpur Nagar in Criminal Case No.3000677 of 2016, (State Vs. Dharmendra Pal & Others) as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.3000677 of 2016, (State Vs. Dharmendra Pal & Others) arising out of case crime no.649 of 2015, under sections 406, 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Kalyanpur, District-Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, IInd Kanpur Nagar.
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S S Shamshery - Full Document

Dharmendra Patel vs State Of U.P. And Another on 26 September, 2024

It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to stay the further proceedings on the basis of impugned charge sheet dated 27.12.2023 as well as impugned cognizance order dated 27.02.2024 in Case No. 391 of 2024 (State v. Dharmendra Patel), arising out of Case Crime No. 198 of 2023, under Section 306 I.P.C., Police Station- Rampur, District- Jaunpur, Pending in the Court of Learned A.C.J.M. 5, Jaunpur, during pendency of the present application before this Hon'ble court. And/or may pass such other and further order, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case."
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - R Misra - Full Document

Dharmendra Pal And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 13 February, 2023

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 5.6.2021 in case crime no.142 of 2020, u/s 323, 341, 506, 325, 308 IPC P.S. Narwal, District Kanpur Nagar and and further to stay the further proceedings of Case No.98278 of 2021 (State Vs. Dharmendra Pal and others) as well as summoning order dated 18.8.2021 passed by M.M. 8th, Kanpur Nagar arising out of aforesaid case crime number.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S Gopal - Full Document

Dharmendra Pal And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 1 August, 2024

2. Challenge in this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to charge sheet dated 05.06.2021 submitted in Case Crime No. 0142 of 2020 under Sections 323, 341, 506, 325, 308 IPC, Police Station-Narwal, District-Kanpur Nagar, and further stay the proceeding of Case No. 98278 of 2021 (State vs. Dharmendra Pal & others) as well as bailable warrant dated 11.03.2024 issued by A.C.J (S.D.), V, Kanpur Nagar arising out of Case Crime No. 0142 of 2020.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1