Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 120 (4.81 seconds)
Documents citing Noor Paul vs Union Of India And Ors on 5 April, 2022

Prateek Chitkara vs Union Of India And Ors on 26 September, 2023

viii) Subject not accused of any offence on account of being a minor 2 See Priya Parameswaran Pillai v. Union of India & Ors. [2015 SCC Online Del 7987] 3 See Kamlesh Sailesh Chandra Chakrabarty v. Union of India & Anr. [W.P(C) 4740/2019: Order dated 29th May 2019]; Brij Bhushan Kathuria v. Union of India & Ors. [2021 SCC Online Del2587]; Nipun Singhal v. Union of India & Ors. [2023: DHC:6486] 4 See Deept Sarup Aggarwal v. Union of India & Anr. [2020: DHC: 3439] 5 See Vikas Chaudhary v. Union of India & Ors. [2022 SCC Online Del 97]; See Income Tax Dept. v. Vikas Chaudhary & Ors. [2022 SCC Online Del 3376] 6 See Noor Paul v. Union of India & Ors. [2022 SCC Online P&H 3408]; See Bank of India v. Noor Paul & Ors. [Special Leave to Appeal (C).
Delhi High Court Cites 47 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

Y S Chowdary vs Bureau Of Immigration on 11 September, 2023

10. Taking into consideration the fact that the case registered against the petitioner pertains to the year 2016 and the fact that till as on date no charge sheet has been filed and the petitioner has not been arrayed as accused in FIR even as on today, and the law laid down by the Apex Court in various judgments (1) Satwant Singh Sawhney v D.Ramarathnam reported in 1967 (2) SCR 521 para 21 (2) Menaka Gandhi v Union of India reported in 1978 (1) SCC 248 para 193, (3) Judgment dated 09.04.2019, in Satish Chandra Verma v Union of India (UOI) reported in (2019) SCC on line SC 2048 Para 5, (4) Judgment of the Apex Court in a judgment reported in 2013 (15) SCC page 570 in Sumit Mehta v State of NCT of Delhi, para 13 and (5) The Judgment of Division Bench of High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Noor Paul Vs. Union of India 6 WP_24657_2023 SN,J reported in 2022 SCC online P & H 1176, and in view of the same, this Court is inclined to grant permission to the petitioner to travel abroad from 17.09.2023 to 19.01.2024.
Telangana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S Nanda - Full Document

Y S Chowdary vs Bureau Of Immigration on 5 January, 2024

11. Taking into consideration the fact that till as on date no charge sheet has been filed and the petitioner has not been arrayed as accused in FIR even as on today, and the law laid down by the Apex Court in various judgments (1) Satwant Singh Sawhney v D.Ramarathnam reported in 1967(2)SCR521para21(2)Menaka Gandhi v Union of India reported in 1978 (1) SCC 248 para 193, (3) Judgment dated 09.04.2019, in Satish Chandra Verma v Union of India (UOI) reported in (2019) SCC on line SC 2048 Para 5, (4) Judgment of the Apex Court in a judgment reported in 2013 (15) SCC page 570 in Sumit Mehta v State of NCT of Delhi, para 13 and (5) The Judgment of Division Bench of High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Noor Paul Vs. Union of India reported in 2022 SCC 6 WP_270_2023 SN,J online P & H 1176, and in view of the same, this Court is inclined to grant permission to the petitioner to travel abroad from 20.01.2024 to 20.06.2024.
Telangana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S Nanda - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next