Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.39 seconds)

Shalu vs Indian Council Medical Research on 16 September, 2025

23. So far as the submissions of learned counsel for the respondents on delay and laches are concerned, it is not disputed by Mr. Shashwat Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents that the applicant participated in the same selection process and she was excluded for no fault of her own. The delay and latches were on the part of the respondents and the applicant cannot be made to suffer due to delay and latches on the part of respondents. We do not find any force in the contentions of the respondents as similar contention has been rejected in identical issue and similar facts by Hon'ble High Court of J & K in case of Dr. Afaq Ahmad Khan (supra).
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The All India Organization Of Chemists ... vs Ut Of J&K And Ors on 2 May, 2025

Productivity losses in this area alone are enormous. Health-related productivity losses are higher still when lost productivity associated with drug-related hospital admissions, including victims of drug-related crimes, is included. These imperative aspects concerned with illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances cannot be overlooked or ignored. Reference in this regard is made to judgement dated 18.04.2025, passed by this Court in HCP no.227/2024 titled as Ishfaq Ahmad Khan vs. Union Territory of J&K and another.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - V C Koul - Full Document

Mir Yasir vs Sheri Kashmir Institute Of Medical ... on 2 September, 2022

02-09-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that the issue which is raised by the petitioner in this petition is squarely the issue pending adjudication in LPA 154/2022 titled Afaq Ahmad Khan versus UT of J&K and others, wherein the Division Bench of this court has shown indulgence by permitting the appellant therein to participate in the process of selection on his own risk and responsibility.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Kumar - Full Document

Union Territory Of J&K Th vs Afaq Ahmad Malik And Anr on 20 June, 2024

HON'BLE MS JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE (ORDER) 20.06.2024 Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, challenging the Bail order dated 19.12.2023 passed in favour of respondent No. 2, by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Pulwama, in case titled Afaq Ahmad Malik Vs. UT of J&K through SHO Police Station, Pulwama in FIR No. 28/2023 of Police Station, Pulwama, for offences under Section 8/21-29 NDPS Act, 3/181, 39/192, 146/196 and 190 M. V. Act.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - M K Kazmi - Full Document
1