Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.63 seconds)

Mohd. Zafar Khan And Ors. (At :- 02:00 ... vs District Judge Hardoi And Ors. on 5 May, 2011

Para - 16- Although, there seems to be a conflict of opinion between the Hon'ble single Judges on the applicability of Sub-rule (1) of Rule 16 to the commercial buildings but, after the decision of Supreme Court in the case of Bhagwan Das (supra), there was no scope of conflict, therefore, I do not consider it necessary to make a recommendation to the Hon'ble Chief Justice to refer the matter to a larger Bench in the present case, and rely upon the said decision and further even in the case of Rama Shanker Rastogi. It was held that the Prescribed Authority could release only a part of the building, if such a plea is raised by the tenant and the tenant had adduced evidence In support of this case before authorities below."
Allahabad High Court Cites 62 - Cited by 1 - A Kumar - Full Document

Agencia E. Sequeira vs Labour Commissioner And Ors. on 18 July, 1994

9. Several authorities were cited by the learned counsel on the matter of the scope of Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution as well as on the question of interpration of statutes, namely, on the cases of Bhagwan Das v. Smt. Jiley Kaur and Anr., , All India Reporter Karmachari Sangh and Ors. v. All India Reporter Ltd and Ors., (1988-I-LLJ-551) (SC), Collector of Customs, Baroda v. Digvijaysinhiji Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd., Jamnagar, ; British India General Insurance Co. Ltd., v. Captain Itbar Singh and Ors. ; Pappu and Anr. v. Raja Tile and Match Works, (1989-I-LLJ-14)(Ker).
Bombay High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

A) Shri Lalitkumar Pravindas Sanghani vs // on 23 February, 2010

23. The learned counsel also relied on a number of judgments on the question of comparative hardship, they are : 1991 Supp (2) SCC 300 (Bhagwan Dass v. Jiley Kaur), (1991) 1 SCC 343 (Bhoolchand v. Kay Pee Cee Investments), (1996) 5 SCC 353 (Prativa Devi v. T.V. Krishnan), (1998) 8 SCC 119 (Sarla ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:38:35 ::: WP 5521/2009 20 Judgment Ahuja v. United India Insurance Company Ltd.), (2008) 1 SCC 173 (Julieta Antonieta Tarcato v. Suleman Ismail), a judgment of Delhi High Court reported at ILR (2004) I Delhi 185 (Jitender K. Jain v. J.K. Horticultural Produce Mktg.)
Bombay High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - R C Chavan - Full Document
1   2 3 Next