Jitendra Shukla vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 14 November, 2025
Against the ex-parte judgment, the revisionist filed an application under Section 126 (2) Cr.P.C. for recall of the ex-parte judgment dated 23rd January, 2019. During the pendency of the application under Section 126 (2) Cr.P.C., opposite party nos. 2 and 3 filed an application for enhancement of the aforesaid maintenance allowance and the trial court vide order dated 19th June, 2023 enhanced the maintenance allowance in favour of opposite party no.3 from Rs.5,000/- per month to Rs. 10,000/- per month. The revisionist challenged order dated 19th June, 2023 before the High Court by means of Criminal Revision No. 4211 of 2023 (Jitendra Shukla Vs. State of U.P. & Others) and the opposite party no.2 has also filed Criminal Revision No. 1375 of 2024 (Smt. Pooja Shukla Vs. State of U.P. & Others) challenging the same order dated 19th June, 2023. The criminal revision no. 4211 of 2023 was disposed of vide order dated 3rd June, 2024 whereas criminal revision no. 1375 of 2024 was disposed of vide order dated 13th June, 2024. During the pendency of application under Section 125 Cr.P.C., the revisionist has filed Petition No. 2 of 2019 under Section 13-A of the Hindu Marriage Act, wherein decree of divorce has been passed by the trial court vide ex parte judgment and order dated 6th August, 2020, awarding Rs. 1,50,000- in favour of opposite party no.2 as permanent alimony and Rs. 50,000/- each to opposite party nos. 3 and 4 as permanent maintenance allowance. The amount of said award as permanent alimony and permanent maintenance allowance has also been received by opposite party no. 2.Against the ex parte judgment and decree of divorce dated 6th August, 2020, the opposite party no.2 filed recall application under Order-IX, Rule-13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which has also been rejected by the trial court.