Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (1.79 seconds)
Documents citing Buddhu vs Municipal Board And Ors. on 18 March, 1952

Shiv Ram vs State Of U.P. & Others on 29 January, 2010

The thrust of the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner has been to hold the judgment rendered in the case of Rajendra Singh (supra) as per incurium in view of the Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of Buddhu Vs. Municipal Board (supra) as well as another Full Bench judgment in the case of Bijli Cotton Mills (Pvt.) Ltd. Hathras and others Vs. Estate Officer/Secretary, National Textile Corporation (U. P. ) Ltd and another 1977 AWC 191.
Allahabad High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - K Murari - Full Document

Shiv Ram vs State Of U.P. & Others on 9 September, 2016

12. Supreme Court in Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd. vs. ITO, AIR 1961 SC 372, A.V.Venkateswaran vs. Ram Chand Sobhraj Wadhwani, AIR 1961 SC 1506, Full Bench of this Court in Buddhu vs. Municipal Board, AIR 1952 SC 753 and Special Bench in Bijli Cotton Mills (Pvt) Ltd. vs. Estate Officer, 1977 AWC 191 held that when the authority passing the order had no jurisdiction or purported to usurp jurisdiction bar of alternative remedy will not apply.
Allahabad High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Babu Ram, Ashok Kumar And Anr. vs Antarim Zila Parishad on 3 February, 1964

20. 1 shall now advert to the cases cited by Sri Gopal Bihari. Firstly, in none of those cases was the Court called upon to overturn the discretion of the Court below. Secondly, in the first four cases difficult questions of constitutional law were involved, and those questions could not be decided by the statutory authorities. It is, however, instructive to quote the remark of Bind Basni Prasad, J. in Buddhu's case, 1952 All LJ 505 : (AIR 1952 All 753 FB). At p. 510 of the report (All LJ): (at p. 757 of AIR) he said:
Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 14 - S N Dwivedi - Full Document

Onkar Nath Tiwari And 2 Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru Chief Secy. Civil ... on 12 September, 2018

12. Supreme Court in Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd. vs. ITO, AIR 1961 SC 372, A.V. Venkateswaran vs. Ram Chand Sobhraj Wadhwani, AIR 1961 SC 1506, Full Bench of this Court in Buddhu vs. Municipal Board, AIR 1952 SC 753 and Special Bench in Bijli Cotton Mills (Pvt.) Ltd. vs. Estate Officer, 1977 AWC 191 held that when the authority passing the order had no jurisdiction or purported to usurp jurisdiction bar of alternative remedy will not apply.
Allahabad High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 1 - A Moin - Full Document

Bharat Board Mills Ltd. vs The Regional Provident Fund ... on 28 February, 1957

18. Mr. Dutt has on the other hand placed reliance on the cases reported in Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras, ; Rashid Ahmed v. The Municipal Board of Kairana, ; The State of Bombay v. The United Motors India Ltd., ; Himmatlal Harilal v. State of M. P., ; Rakhaldas Mukherjee v. S. P. Ghosh, at p. 175 (U); Buddhu v. Municipal Board, Allahabad, and Chairman Budge Budge Municipality v. Mangru Mia, .
Calcutta High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 34 - Full Document

Raghbir Singh vs Municipal Board Of Hardwar Union, ... on 26 September, 1955

In the case of -- 'Buddhu v. Municipal Board Allahabad', AIR 1952 All 753 (FB) (B), it was held by this Court that "in every case in which a fundamental right is involved a decision should be given by the Court on merits of an application under Article 226. There may be cases in which the existence of an alternative remedy may be a ground for the rejection of the application. The circumstances of each case should be considered and then a decision should be taken whether or not the discretion should be exercised.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1   2 Next