Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.30 seconds)
Documents citing Ronald Albert Casanova vs State (Govt. Of Nct Delhi) on 6 January, 2016

Hari Kishan vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 31 May, 2019

8. Reliance is placed on behalf of the petitioner on the verdict of Sonam Chaudhary v. The State (Government of NCT of Delhi); Nitin Verma v. State (Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.); Dharmendra Singh v. The State(Government of NCT of Delhi), Ronald Albert v. State(Government of NCT of Delhi), disposed of vide common judgment dated 6.1.2016 reported in 2016 1 JCC 307. The facts in each of the aforementioned cases are in circumstances pari materia to the instant case and it has been observed vide paragraph 31 to 36 thereof as under:
Delhi High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 8 - A Malhotra - Full Document

Jashandeep Singh vs The State & Anr on 23 June, 2021

8. Reliance is placed on behalf of the petitioner on the verdict of Sonam Chaudhary v. The State (Government of NCT of Delhi); Nitin Verma v. State (Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.); Dharmendra Singh v. The State(Government of NCT of Delhi), Ronald Albert v. State(Government of NCT of Delhi), disposed of vide common judgment dated 6.1.2016 reported in 2016 1 JCC 307. The facts in each of the aforementioned cases are in circumstances pari materia to the instant case and it has been observed vide paragraph 31 to 36 thereof as under:
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - J Singh - Full Document

State vs . Sanjay Kumar on 2 July, 2022

Relying upon the principles laid down in the aforesaid judgments, the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case tilted as Ronald Albert Casanova v. State on 6 January, 2016 acquitted the accused. The facts of the case were that one live cartridge was recovered from the handbag of the accused while scanning his bag at Anand Vihar Metro Station. The Hon'ble High court after discussing the case law, held that as the petitioners were not aware of the presence of the live cartridge in their handbags till the same were detected by the secularity personnel during screening, it can be inferred that the possession does not fall within the ambit of conscious possession and thereby acquitted the accused.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1