Rinky Rastogi vs . State Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors. on 7 October, 2022
(c) Indrapuri Primary Cooperative Housing Society Vs. Bhabani
Gogoi, { 1991 CRL. L. J. 1765 }
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.71 seconds)Mrs. Jesmin Rahman vs Mrs. Afruza Begum And Anr. on 25 September, 2007
(See Indrapuri Primary Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and Anr. v. Sri Bhabani Gogoi reported in (1991)1 GLR 228 : 1991 Cri LJ 1765.
St. George Syrian Church vs The Revenue Divisional Officer on 14 December, 2012
53) and Indrapuri Primary Co-operative Housing Society
Ltd. and another v. Sri.Bhabani Gogoi (1991 Crl.L.J 1765)
to urge that this Court cannot be called upon to exercise its
inherent jurisdiction to go into questions over the sufficiency of
materials and other circumstances which satisfy the magistrate
W.P.(C).NO.15129/2012
& 5
Crl.M.C.NO.2713/2012
to commence proceedings under Section 145 of the Code over
the subject matter. No interference with Annexures I and J
orders passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate in the facts and
circumstances of the case is called for is the submission of the
learned Govt. Pleader.
Sh. Chandra Dev Mahto vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 2 November, 2011
"The interdict contained in Section 397(2) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Code') is that the powers
of revision shall not be exercised in relation to any
interlocutory order. Whether an order is interlocutory or
not, cannot be decided by merely looking at the order or
merely because the order was passed at the interlocutory
stage. The safe test laid down by this Court through
a series of decisions is this; if the contention of the
petitioner who moved the superior Court in revision,
as against the order under challenge is upheld,
would the criminal proceedings as a whole
culminate ? If it would, then the order is not
interlocutory in spite of the fact that it was passed
during any interlocutory stage.***
The feasible test is whether by upholding the objections
raised by a party, it would result in culminating the
proceedings, if so any order passed on such objections
would not be merely interlocutory in nature as envisaged
in Section 397(2) of the Code." [Emphasis supplied]
Sh. Kirpal Singh vs Mrs. Dikka Devi on 22 September, 2009
(See Indrapuri Primary Co
operative Housing Society Ltd. and Anr. v. Sri
Bhabani Gogoi reported in (1991)1 GLR 228 :
Munna Singh @ Shivaji Singh And Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 11 October, 2011
This full bench decision has been followed by a learned Single Judge of the Gauhati High Court in the case of Indrapuri Primary Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and another Vs. Sri Bhabani Gogoi, reported in 1991 Cri.LJ. 1765.
Md. Osman Ali Saikia And Anr vs Chand Mahamod Saikia And 2 Ors on 8 November, 2023
(See Indrapuri Primary
Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and Anr. v. Sri Bhabani
Gogoi reported in (1991) 1 GLR 28.
Page No.# 1/14 vs The State Of Assam And 2 Ors on 27 March, 2025
In the case of Indrapuri Primary Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd.
& Anr. Vs. Sri Bhabani Gogoi, reported in 1991 1 GLR 28, a Co-ordinate
Bench of this Court had expressed the view in paragraph No. 11 of the
judgment as under:
Musstt. Merabjun Nessa Laskar vs The State Of Assam And Anr on 20 October, 2022
In paragraph 10 of the judgment of this Court rendered in Indrapuri Primary
Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. (supra), this Court explained what is an
interlocutory order as follows:
Badrul Islam Laskar vs The State Of Assam And Anr on 20 October, 2022
In paragraph 10 of the judgment of this Court rendered in Indrapuri Primary
Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. (supra), this Court explained what is an
interlocutory order as follows: