Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (1.48 seconds)Vinod And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 3 February, 2021
5. Susequent to aforesaid F.I.R., Investigating Officer proceeded with statutory investigation of above mentioned Case Crime Number in terms of Chater XII Cr.P.C. On the basis of material collected by Investigating Officer, during course of Investigation, he formed an opinion that a charge should be submitted. Accordingly, Investigating Officer submitted the charge-sheet dated 24.6.2019, whereby named accused i.e. applicants herein have been charge-sheeted under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 448, 387 IPC. Upon submission of above charge-sheet C.J,M Jhansi. The date of occurrence has been shown as 15.02.20196 by a common order dated 13.8.2019 took cognizance upon the same and simultaneously summoned the accused. As a result Criminal Case No. 2200 of 2019 (State of U.P. Vs. Vinod and others) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 448 and 384 I.P.C. came to be registered in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhansi.
Rishi Ram Yadav And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 22 August, 2025
In view of the aforesaid, the charge sheet dated 12.02.2019 as well cognizance order dated 11.03.2019 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Bareilly, District Bareilly, in Case No.780 of 2019 (State of U.P. Vs. Vinod Kumar and others), arising out of Case Crime No.934 of 2018, under sections 406, 323, 504, 506, IPC, Police Station Baradari, District Bareilly and entie proceeding of aforesaid case, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Bareilly, District Bareilly, are hereby quashed.
Gaurav Bhatnagar And 10 Others vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 2 January, 2023
In view of the above, the proceedings Case No. 6207 of 2017 (State Vs. Gaurav Bhatnagar & Others), Case Crime No. 317 of 2016, U/S 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. Police Station- Meerapur, District- Muzaffar Nagar, are hereby quashed.
Chandrashekhar Shukla vs State Of U.P. And Another on 22 September, 2025
9. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed and entire proceedings of Case No.1430 of 2000 (State of U.P. vs. Vinod Kumar & others), arising out of Case Crime No.368 of 1997, under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Hamirpur are hereby quashed.
Suresh Chandra Tripathi vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 22 December, 2022
2. Applicant (complainant) is before this Court being aggrieved by impugned order dated 08.09.2021 whereby an application filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to summon opposite party nos. 2 and 3 to face trial in Sessions Trial No. 897 of 2017 (State of U.P. vs. Vinod and others) arising out Case Crime No. 541 of 2016 under Sections 307, 504, 325 IPC, Police Station Ghoorpur, District Allahabad has been rejected.
Gokul Prasad vs Ram Singh And Ors. on 7 January, 1991
14. Reliance is placed on State of U.P. v. Vinod Kumar Bhatnagar 1984 ACJ 776 (Allahabad), where to a boy, aged about 20 years and student of B.A. Part III, for amputation of right arm the compensation awarded was Rs. 42,000/-.
Rattan Lal Mehta vs Rajinder Kapoor on 19 January, 1996
(20) The view that compensation is to be 'full and fair' (and not merely based on 'solace') has been also expressed in a large number of cases in our country (Concord of India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Nirmala Devi (1980 Acj 55 (SC); State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Vinod Kumar Bhatnagar (1984 Acj 776 (Allahabad); Ranjit Singh Gopal Singh vs. Meenaxi Ben (1972) 13 Guj.
Rattan Lal Mehta vs Rajinder Kapoor And Anr. on 19 January, 1996
The view that compensation is to be 'full and fair' (and not merely based on 'solace') has been also expressed in a large number of cases in our country, Concord of India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nirmala Devi 1980 ACJ 55 (SC); State of Uttar Pradesh v. Vinod Kumar Bhatnagar 1984 ACJ 776 Allahabad; Ranjit Singh Gopal Singh v. Meenaxi Ben (1972) 13 Guj.
Rajendra vs Bishambhar Nath And Ors. on 8 January, 1986
In this connection the decision in State of U.P. v. Vinod Kumar AIR 1984 344 All may usefully be perused.