Sadhu Singh vs Gurpreet Singh And Ors on 18 September, 2017
This revision petition has been filed by the father of the
petitioner in CR No.6080 of 2017 titled 'Jagroop Singh Vs. Gurpreet Singh
& another' decided vide separate order of even date. The present petitioner
had filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC in Rent Petition bearing
No.RP/537/14 pending before the Rent Controller, Ludhiana. The Rent
Controller has dismissed the application for good and sufficient reasons.
The presence of the petitioner is not necessary for determination of
controversy between the petitioner in the connected revision petition (CR
No.6080 of 2017) and the respondent claiming to be landlord/owner. Father
and son duo are to be seen mixed up to try and avert proceedings for eviction
from the demised shop and to protract the trial one way or the other. If the
father was so interested, he could have filed a title suit and not set up a case
that he has passed on the possession to his son or that he got the possession
of the demised shop from one Bihari Lal long years ago. It is not the case
that the petitioners in both the cases have built their case on title deeds to the
property in dispute. The Rent Controller, Ludhiana has done well in
1 of 2
::: Downloaded on - 23-09-2017 15:14:06 :::
2
CR No.6317 of 2017 (O&M)
dismissing the application and I affirm that order. Consequently, the petition
is also dismissed being devoid of merit.