Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.26 seconds)

Rattanjit vs Amarjeet Singh & Ors on 29 January, 2019

Mr. Bawa also relied upon a judgment of a co-ordinate Bench of this court in Ram Singh and another v. Shiv Narain 2006 (3) RCR (Civil) 432, to submit that where once it is proved that a person against whom a 5 of 11 ::: Downloaded on - 17-02-2019 09:20:41 ::: CR no.5522 of 2014 -6- decree of injunction had been passed had disobeyed it, the consequences flowing from the provisions of Order 21 Rule 32 CPC would be visited upon such person.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A R Singh - Full Document

Bhoop Singh vs Partap Singh @ Pat Ram And Others on 13 July, 2011

While the present decree was passed on 25.02.99. Moreover, this plea had already been taken by the objector in his written statement which was not accepted by the court and passed the judgment and decree dated 25.2.1999 Ex.DH/1. Moreover, this court cannot go behind the decree. There is no dispute with regard to the law settled Jai Narayan Vs.Boda Ram @ Boda Raj @ Bod Raj, 2007(2) LJR page 421 (P&H), but in view of the law relied upon by the counsel for the decree holder cited as Ram Singh & Another Vs. Shiv Narain & others, 2006(4) CCC page 518 (P&H), the JDs are directed to remove the construction raised around the property in question within the period of one month failing which the same would be removed at the cost of JDs after passing the above mentioned period. Accordingly, the objection petition is hereby dismissed."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - M S Sullar - Full Document
1