Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (1.38 seconds)

The Chief Engineer vs The Joint Director on 11 April, 2023

10. The next plea that was raised by the petitioner Board is that the Board is neither factory nor any establishment coming under the purview of Conferment of Permanent Act. Only a person who satisfies the criteria laid down in Rule 6(4) of said Act can approach the competent authority. The respondents 2 to 5 will not satisfy the criteria under Rule 6(4). Moreover, the power under Rule 6 is only to issue direction to correct the entries in the register and the 1st respondent cannot 12/26 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.18754 of 2017 exercise his power and confer conferment of permanency. The relevant rule is extracted hereunder:
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - S Srimathy - Full Document

The Chief Engineer vs The Joint Director on 11 April, 2023

10. The next plea that was raised by the petitioner Board is that the Board is neither factory nor any establishment coming under the purview of Conferment of Permanent Act. Only a person who satisfies the criteria laid down in Rule 6(4) of said Act can approach the competent authority. The respondents 2 to 5 will not satisfy the criteria under Rule 6(4). Moreover, the power under Rule 6 is only to issue direction to correct the entries in the register and the 1st respondent cannot 12/26 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.18754 of 2017 exercise his power and confer conferment of permanency. The relevant rule is extracted hereunder:
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - S Srimathy - Full Document
1