Arjun Lal vs Kultar Sood S/O Sh. Mool Singh on 1 November, 2011
16.In the case of Atma Ram Properties (supra), contention was
raised based on the use of the expression "may" as against the
expression "shall", in the context of requirement of notice to be
served on the landlord within the period of six months of the
ARCT No. 29/08 Arjun Lal Vs. Kultar Sood & anr. 11 of 14
DRC Act coming into force. Undoubtedly, in that case a single
bench of Hon'ble High Court took a view that this would
indicate that the service of notice in writing was not mandatory.