Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 441 (0.16 seconds)
Documents citing Bharpur Singh & Ors vs Shamsher Singh on 12 December, 2008

Brajesh Singh vs Smt. Neelam Singh on 20 August, 2024

24. The Supreme Court in the case of Bharp Bharpur Singh and others v. Shamsher Singh,Singh, reported in (2009) 3 SCC 687 has held that it may be true that Will was a registered one, but the same by itself would not mean that the statutory requirements of proving the Will need not be complied with. In terms off Section 63(c), Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68, Evidence Act, 1872, the propounder of a Will must prove its execution by examining one or more attesting witnesses and propounder of Will must prove that the Will was signed by the testator in a sound and and disposing state of mind duly understanding the nature and effect of disposition and he put his signature on the document of his own free Will.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Smt. Kamla Shukla vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 March, 2024

24. The Supreme Court in the case of Bharpur Singh and others v. Shamsher Singh, reported in (2009) 3 SCC 687 has held that it may be true that Will was a registered one, but the same by itself would not mean that the statutory requirements of proving the Will need not be complied with. In terms of Section 63(c), Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68, Evidence Act, 1872, the propounder of a Will must prove its execution by examining one or more attesting witnesses and propounder of Will must prove that the Will was signed by the testator in a sound and disposing state of mind duly understanding the nature and effect of disposition and he put his signature on the document of his own free Will.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Dhruv Kumar Dwivedi vs Rajbhan Dwivedi on 25 April, 2024

24. The Supreme Court in the case of Bharpur Singh and others v. Shamsher Singh, reported in (2009) 3 SCC 687 has held that it may be true that Will was a registered one, but the same by itself would not mean that the statutory requirements of proving the Will need not be complied with. In terms of Section 63(c), Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68, Evidence Act, 1872, the propounder of a Will must prove its execution by examining one or more attesting witnesses and propounder of Will must prove that the Will was signed by the testator in a sound and disposing state of mind duly understanding the nature and effect of disposition and he put his signature on the document of his own free Will.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Chandesh vs Naresh on 3 May, 2024

24. The Supreme Court in the case of Bharpur Singh and others v. Shamsher Singh, reported in (2009) 3 SCC 687 has held that it may be true that Will was a registered one, but the same by itself would not mean that the statutory requirements of proving the Will need not be complied with. In terms of Section 63(c), Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68, Evidence Act, 1872, the propounder of a Will must prove its execution by examining one or more attesting witnesses and propounder of Will must Signature Not Verified Signed by: SHUBHANKAR MISHRA Signing time: 03-May-24 7:19:25 PM 28 W.P. No.10351/2024 prove that the Will was signed by the testator in a sound and disposing state of mind duly understanding the nature and effect of disposition and he put his signature on the document of his own free Will.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Rajkumar vs Vijay Singh on 28 July, 2025

12 The Supreme Court in the case of Bharpur Singh and others v. Shamsher Singh, reported in (2009) 3 SCC 687 has held that it may be true that Will was a registered one, but the same by itself would not mean that the statutory requirements of proving the Will need not be complied with. In terms of Section 63(c), Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68, Evidence Act, 1872, the propounder of a Will must prove its execution by examining one or more attesting witnesses and propounder of Will must prove that the Will was signed by the testator in a sound and disposing state of mind duly understanding the nature and effect of disposition and he put his signature on the document of his own free Will.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Mahendra vs Smt. Kiran on 30 July, 2024

24. The Supreme Court in the case of Bharpur Singh and others v. Shamsher Singh, reported in (2009) 3 SCC 687 has held that it may be true that Will was a registered one, but the same by itself would not mean that the statutory requirements of proving the Will need not be complied with. In terms of Section 63(c), Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68, Evidence Act, 1872, the propounder of a Will must prove its execution by examining one or more attesting witnesses and propounder of Will must 27 M.P. No.3740/2024 prove that the Will was signed by the testator in a sound and disposing state of mind duly understanding the nature and effect of disposition and he put his signature on the document of his own free Will.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Devkrishna Raikwar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 August, 2024

24. The Supreme Court in the case of Bharpur Singh, reported in Singh and others v. Shamsher Singh, (2009) 3 SCC 687 has held that it may be true that Will was a registered one, but the same by itself would not mean that the statutory requirements of proving the Will need not be complied with. In terms of Section 63(c), Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68, Evidence Act, 1872, the propounder of a Will must prove its execution by examining one or more attesting witnesses and propounder of Will must prove that the Will was signed by the testator in a sound and disposing state of mind duly understanding the nature and effect of disposition and he put his signature on the document of his own free Will.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Ranvijay Singh vs Sangram Singh on 16 March, 2026

46. The Supreme Court in the case of Bharpur Singh and others v. Shamsher Singh, reported in (2009) 3 SCC 687 , has held that it may be true that Will was a registered one, but the same by itself would not mean that the statutory requirements of proving the Will need not be complied with. In terms of Section 63(c), Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68, Evidence Act, 1872, the propounder of a Will must prove its execution by examining one or more attesting witnesses and propounder of Will must prove that the Will was signed by the testator in a sound and disposing state of mind duly understanding the nature and effect of disposition and he put his signature on the document of his own free Will.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Rajendra Prasad Dwivedi vs Harvansh Prasad Dwivedi on 25 April, 2024

24. The Supreme Court in the case of Bharpur Singh and others v. Shamsher Singh, reported in (2009) 3 SCC 687 has held that it may be true that Will was a registered one, but the same by itself would not mean that the statutory requirements of proving the Will need not be complied with. In terms of Section 63(c), Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68, Evidence Act, 1872, the propounder of a Will must prove its execution by examining one or more attesting witnesses and propounder of Will must prove that the Will was signed by the testator in a sound and disposing state of mind duly understanding the nature and effect of disposition and he put his signature on the document of his own free Will.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Babulal vs Smt.Sudha on 26 November, 2025

16. The Supreme Court in the case of Bharpur Singh and others v. Shamsher Singh, reported in (2009) 3 SCC 687 , has held that it may be true that Will was a registered one, but the same by itself would not mean that the statutory requirements of proving the Will need not be complied with. In terms of Section 63(c), Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68, Evidence Act, 1872, the propounder of a Will must prove its execution by examining one or more attesting witnesses and propounder of Will must prove that the Will was signed by the testator in a sound and disposing state of mind duly understanding the nature and effect of disposition and he put his signature on the document of his own free Will.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - A K Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next