Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 419 (1.58 seconds)
Documents citing Anwar Ali vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 25 September, 2020

Anwar vs State on 15 February, 2022

(xi) Ossification Test cannot be the sole criterion for age determination and a mechanical view regarding the age of a person cannot be adopted solely on the basis of medical opinion by radiological examination. Such evidence is not conclusive evidence but only a very useful guiding factor to be considered in the absence of documents mentioned in Section 94(2) CA No. 3/22 Anwar Vs. State 7/13 of the JJ Act, 2015.
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of Karnataka vs Narasimhamurthy @ Murthy on 27 October, 2022

44. Further, as referred to supra, the judgment in the case of Mohan @ Srinivas vs. State of Karnataka ((2022) 1 MAD LJ (Cri) 319)) is also referred to. This judgment has been rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India by referring to the reliance in the case of Anwar Ali and Anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (AIR 2020 SC 4519). It is held that, this Court, time and again has laid down the law on the scope of inquiry by an Appellate Court while dealing with an appeal against acquittal under Section 378 Cr.P.C. Whereas in the aforesaid reliance in paragraph 24, it is held thus:
Karnataka High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - K Somashekar - Full Document

Page No.# 1/77 vs The State Of Assam on 5 August, 2023

In Anwar Ali and Anr. v. State of Himachal Pradesh: (2020) 10 SCC 166, this Court has referred to and relied upon the principles enunciated in previous decisions and has laid down as under: -"24. Now so far as the submission on behalf of the accused that in the present case the prosecution has failed to establish and prove the motive and therefore the accused deserves acquittal is concerned, it is true that the absence of proving the motive cannot be a ground to reject the prosecution case.
Gauhati High Court Cites 88 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Harvinder Singh @ Bachhu vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 13 October, 2023

23. This Court, time and again has laid down the law on the scope of inquiry by an appellate court while dealing with an appeal against acquittal under Section 378 CrPC. We do not wish to multiply the aforesaid principle except placing reliance on a recent decision of this Court in Anwar Ali v. State of H.P. [(2020) 10 SCC 166 : (2021) 1 SCC (Cri) 395] : (SCC pp. 182-85, para
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 2 - M M Sundresh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next