Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.40 seconds)
Documents citing Badri Prasad vs Lakshmi Narain on 12 March, 1963

Dr. Munish Chandra Gupta vs Additional District Judge, Court No. 5 ... on 7 August, 2007

In the case of Badri Prasad v. Laxmi Narain (supra) the statements of postman was disbelieved and in this fact situation it was held that no question of raising of presumption under Section 27 can arise. The said decision is rested on the special facts of that case and has no application in the present case inasmuch as the statement of postman has been believed by the two courts below and the said statement at this stage, i.e., at the stage of writ petition cannot be disbelieved.
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 1 - P Krishna - Full Document

Sharad vs Vishnu on 4 April, 1977

9. Mr. Somalwar contended that the plaintiff would be entitled to a presumption arising from the fact that the registered notice has been sent even though the evidence about the receipt of notice by the defendant's wife is not accepted. I do not think that such a presumption would be available in a case where the plaintiff has led positive evidence that the notice was served on the; defendant in a particular manner. This aspect has been considered by the above mentioned decision of the Allahabad High Court in in Badri Prasad's case in the following words (at p. 427):
Bombay High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1