Sengottuvel vs Muthusamy Gounder @ Muthu Gounder on 3 June, 2025
(iv)2003 SCC Online Ker 245 : AIR 2004 Ker 75 in the case of Gouri Amma
Krishnamma Vs. Seethalakshmi Amma and others.;
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.68 seconds)Sengottuvel vs Muthusamy Gounder @ Muthu Gounder on 3 June, 2025
(iv)2003 SCC Online Ker 245 : AIR 2004 Ker 75 in the case of Gouri Amma
Krishnamma Vs. Seethalakshmi Amma and others.;
Sh. R. S. Vaish vs Union Of India on 31 October, 2012
16. The law regarding easement is discussed in Gauri
Amma Krishnamma Vs Seethalakshmi Amma and Ors
AIR 2004 Kerala 75. It was held that alternative
inconvenient pathway is no ground for claiming easement
of necessity. Necessity must be absolute and not
convenient mode of enjoyment. Similar view was taken in
Sanjeev Kumar Jain Versus Sh. Raghubir Saran
Charitable Trust & Ors. 2004 (8) AD Delhi 398. In the
RCA 26/12 10 of 11
11
case in hand the plaintiff has alternative passage on the
western side. Thus there is hardly any scope of claiming
easement on the eastern side.
M/S. K.T. Rajan vs Sh. Mohinder Kumar Jain (Now Deceased) on 17 October, 2013
In this regard, reliance has been placed on the judgment of Gouri
Amma Krishanamma v. Seethalakshmi Amma & Ors., AIR 2004
Kerala 75 wherein it was held, that alternative inconvenient pathway is no
ground for claiming easement of necessity. The necessity must be absolute
and not a convenient mode of enjoyment.
Page 1 Of 26 Puran Chand Yogi & Ors. vs . U.O.I & Ors. Suit No. 244/09/05 on 2 May, 2016
In Gauri Amma Krishnaamma Vs. Seethalakshmi Amma &
Ors., AIR 2004, KER 75, it has been held that alternative inconvenient
pathway is no ground of claiming easement of necessity.
1