Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 104 (1.56 seconds)
Documents citing Dr. Kashinath G. Jalmi And Anr. Etc. Etc vs Speaker And Ors on 31 March, 1993

Karnataka Kaigarika ... vs State Of Karnataka on 8 May, 2020

In the case of Dr Kashinath G. Jalmi and Another Vs. The Speaker and Others stated supra, the factual matrix leading to the appeal is discussed by the Apex Court in paragraph 3, 4 and 5. The Apex Court was examining the issue as to whether the power of review is vested in the Speaker enabling him to review his own order under the tenth schedule of the Constitution and while so, considering the same, the Apex Court considered the issue of laches in the matter of preferring the petition impugning the legality of the order passed in review by the Speaker. The order in review was passed by the Speaker on 08.03.1991 and the writ petition was filed on 08.01.1992 that is after the passage of about eight months. The Apex Court has discussed the issue of laches in paragraph 13 and observed in paragraph 16 and 22, 25 and opined in paragraph 34 as under:-
Karnataka High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - G Narendar - Full Document

Satish Chandra Mishra vs Union Of India And Others on 16 December, 2019

31. From the aforesaid pronouncements it is graphically clear that a citizen can claim a writ of quo warranto and he stands in the position of a relater. He need not have any special interest or personal interest. The real test is to see whether the person holding the office is authorised to hold the same as per law. Delay and laches do not constitute any impediment to deal with the lis on merits and it has been so stated in Dr. Kashinath G. Jalmi and another v. The Speaker and others (1993) 2 SCC 703."
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - T S Chauhan - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next