Yamuna Singh vs Gnct Of Delhi Etc on 24 December, 2024
6. The alleged bills, are highly inflated, non-descriptive, non-item
wise, without rate, specification, date, place/office and were without
mentioning the fact as to when and where the alleged works or services
were executed/provided, further, said bills do not carry signature of
recipients in respect of such services/maintenance, as bill No.634,
dated 22.04.2012, shows that plaintiff has claimed therein an amount
of Rs.15800/- on account of 2 TR AC Gas Charging @ Rs.3500/- each,
for 4 ACs, i.e., Rs.14000/-, also on account of change of two
Capacitors with labour charges @ Rs.900/- each, i.e. Rs.1800/-,
totaling to Rs.15,800/- and the said bill No.634, nowhere mentions for
which branch/office, the said work was done and who were the
recipients of these services, further, there was no verification of the
CS No. 864/2016
Sh. Yamuna Singh v. GNCT of Delhi & Ors.