Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.36 seconds)
Documents citing Dattaji Chirandas vs State Of Gujarat And Anr. on 7 April, 1998

Ram Lok & Ors vs State Of H.P. & Anr on 12 April, 2023

In Dattaji Chirandas vs. State of Gujarat, 1999 (3) GLR 2189, the Gujarat High Court had an occasion to consider the relevant provisions of the Gujarat Industrial Development Act and held that the pleasure doctrine and applicability thereof in the matter of appointment and removal of persons nominated to high public offices cannot be said to be arbitrary, unreasonable or unconstitutional in any manner. If such appointments are made initially by nomination on political considerations, there can be no justification in resisting termination of such appointments on political considerations. Such nominees appointed on political considerations do not have the will or authority of the people of the State unlike those elected by the people of the State.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Jagdishbhai Mafatlal Patel vs State Of Gujarat on 27 December, 2001

In Dattaji Chirandas's case (supra), learned single Judge of this Court had an occasion to consider the relevant provisions of the Gujarat Industrial Development Act and held that the pleasure doctrine and applicability thereof in the matter of appointment and removal of persons nominated to high public offices cannot be said to be arbitrary, unreasonable or unconstitutional in any manner. If such appointments are made initially by nomination on political considerations, there can be no justification in resisting termination of such appointments on political considerations. Such nominees appointed on political considerations do not have the will or authority of the people of the State unlike those elected by the people of the State.
Gujarat High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 7 - A M Kapadia - Full Document
1