Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 543 (1.56 seconds)
Documents citing R.K.Anand vs Registrar,Delhi High Court on 29 July, 2009

R. Muthukrishnan vs The Registrar General Of The High Court ... on 28 January, 2019

In R.K. Anand v. Registrar, Delhi High Court (supra) relied on by the respondents, the witnesses were tampered with by the appellant. A sting operation was conducted by the T.V. Channel in connection with BMW hit and run case. Advocate ­ R.K. Anand was found to be guilty of contempt of Court. He was debarred from appearing in Court for a certain period. The Court also dealt with a motivated application filed for recusal. The Court expressed concern and sharp deprecation of such tendencies and practices of Members of Bar and held that such prayer for recusal ordinarily should be viewed as interference in the due course of justice leading to penal consequences. The submission was raised that professional misconduct is dealt with under Advocates Act. The Delhi High Court Rules do not provide that Advocate on conviction for Contempt of Court would be barred from appearing in Court.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 58 - Cited by 31 - A Mishra - Full Document

Sri. Basavaprabhu Swamiji vs State Of Karnataka on 3 November, 2023

41. This Court is not oblivious of the fact that the two persons named in the written complaint are not before this Court. Nevertheless, having regard to the firm opinion of this Court that the proceedings initiated at the behest of the respondent-complainant Sri.Basavaprabhu Swamiji is a deliberate attempt, -66- calculated to derail the trial against the Pontiff of the Mutt and it is the bounden duty of this Court to insulate the criminal case from outside interferences, as directed by the Apex Court in the case of R.K.Anand (supra), this Court is of the considered opinion that the registration of the FIR and all further proceedings thereto in Crime No.484/2022 of the respondent-Chitradurga Police cannot be sustained.
Karnataka High Court Cites 71 - Cited by 0 - R Devdas - Full Document

Nagarbhai Govindbhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 15 February, 2018

Similarly, the Apex Court in the case of R.K. Anand v. Registrar, Delhi High Court, (2009)8 SCC 106, has made observations in paragraph Nos. 255 to 273 and has taken the same exception on the request made for recusal of the judge from hearing a case. The Apex Court in paragraph 255 of the said judgment, discussed the question of "Request" for Recusal. In paragraphs 264, 269, 270 the Apex Court has made observations, as under:-
Gujarat High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - J B Pardiwala - Full Document

Sri Appu Poojari A.T vs The State By Karnataka on 6 October, 2023

13. Unlike US and certain other countries where a sting operation is recognised as a legal method of law enforcement, though in a limited manner as will be noticed hereinafter, the same is not the position in India which makes the issues arising in the present case somewhat unique. A sting operation carried out in public interest has had the approval of this Court in R.K. Anand v. High Court of Delhi [(2009) 8 SCC 106:
Karnataka High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document

Dr.S.G Savitha vs The State By Karnataka on 6 October, 2023

13. Unlike US and certain other countries where a sting operation is recognised as a legal method of law enforcement, though in a limited manner as will be noticed hereinafter, the same is not the position in India which makes the issues arising in the present case somewhat unique. A sting operation carried out in public interest has had the approval of this Court in R.K. Anand v. High Court of Delhi [(2009) 8 SCC 106:
Karnataka High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next