citedby: 58448

1 - 10 of 1100 (6.69 seconds)

Documents citing State Of Madya Pradesh & Ors vs Sri S.S. Kourav & Ors on 19 January, 1995

Hon Ble Mr. A.K.Bhardwaj vs Union Of India Through Its on 9 May, 2013

In State of M.P. v. S.S.Kourav the Administrative Tribunal had interfered with the transfer order of the respondent and directed him to be posted at a particular place. It is relevant to that while setting aside the order of the Tribunal this Court observed in para 4 of its judgment as follows:

Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 38 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Umesh Kumar Tiwari vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan on 24 February, 2023

11. As far as transfer during mid academic session is concerned, the Court does not have the power to annul the transfer order only on the ground that it will cause personal inconvenience to the employee, his family members and children as consideration of these views fall within the exclusive domain of the employer. If the transfer order is made in mid-academic session of the children of the employee, the Court/Tribunal cannot interfere. It is for the employer to consider such a personal grievance. This aspect has also been considered by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of M.P. vs. S.S. Kaurav (1995) 3 SCC 270 wherein it has been held that it is not permissible for the Court to go into the relative hardship of the Page 85 of 88 Sub:KVS Tansfer matter 86 employees. It is for the administration to consider the facts of given case and mitigate the real hardship in the interest of good and efficient administration.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt Meena Umraiya vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan on 24 February, 2023

11. As far as transfer during mid academic session is concerned, the Court does not have the power to annul the transfer order only on the ground that it will cause personal inconvenience to the employee, his family members and children as consideration of these views fall within the exclusive domain of the employer. If the transfer order is made in mid-academic session of the children of the employee, the Court/Tribunal cannot interfere. It is for the employer to consider such a personal grievance. This aspect has also been considered by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of M.P. vs. S.S. Kaurav (1995) 3 SCC 270 wherein it has been held that it is not permissible for the Court to go into the relative hardship of the Page 85 of 88 Sub:KVS Tansfer matter 86 employees. It is for the administration to consider the facts of given case and mitigate the real hardship in the interest of good and efficient administration.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt Anju Sinha vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan on 24 February, 2023

11. As far as transfer during mid academic session is concerned, the Court does not have the power to annul the transfer order only on the ground that it will cause personal inconvenience to the employee, his family members and children as consideration of these views fall within the exclusive domain of the employer. If the transfer order is made in mid-academic session of the children of the employee, the Court/Tribunal cannot interfere. It is for the employer to consider such a personal grievance. This aspect has also been considered by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of M.P. vs. S.S. Kaurav (1995) 3 SCC 270 wherein it has been held that it is not permissible for the Court to go into the relative hardship of the Page 85 of 88 Sub:KVS Tansfer matter 86 employees. It is for the administration to consider the facts of given case and mitigate the real hardship in the interest of good and efficient administration.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ajay Kumar Mishra vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan on 24 February, 2023

11. As far as transfer during mid academic session is concerned, the Court does not have the power to annul the transfer order only on the ground that it will cause personal inconvenience to the employee, his family members and children as consideration of these views fall within the exclusive domain of the employer. If the transfer order is made in mid-academic session of the children of the employee, the Court/Tribunal cannot interfere. It is for the employer to consider such a personal grievance. This aspect has also been considered by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of M.P. vs. S.S. Kaurav (1995) 3 SCC 270 wherein it has been held that it is not permissible for the Court to go into the relative hardship of the Page 85 of 88 Sub:KVS Tansfer matter 86 employees. It is for the administration to consider the facts of given case and mitigate the real hardship in the interest of good and efficient administration.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt D Sujata Rao vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan on 24 February, 2023

11. As far as transfer during mid academic session is concerned, the Court does not have the power to annul the transfer order only on the ground that it will cause personal inconvenience to the employee, his family members and children as consideration of these views fall within the exclusive domain of the employer. If the transfer order is made in mid-academic session of the children of the employee, the Court/Tribunal cannot interfere. It is for the employer to consider such a personal grievance. This aspect has also been considered by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of M.P. vs. S.S. Kaurav (1995) 3 SCC 270 wherein it has been held that it is not permissible for the Court to go into the relative hardship of the Page 85 of 88 Sub:KVS Tansfer matter 86 employees. It is for the administration to consider the facts of given case and mitigate the real hardship in the interest of good and efficient administration.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar Kurachiya vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan on 24 February, 2023

11. As far as transfer during mid academic session is concerned, the Court does not have the power to annul the transfer order only on the ground that it will cause personal inconvenience to the employee, his family members and children as consideration of these views fall within the exclusive domain of the employer. If the transfer order is made in mid-academic session of the children of the employee, the Court/Tribunal cannot interfere. It is for the employer to consider such a personal grievance. This aspect has also been considered by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of M.P. vs. S.S. Kaurav (1995) 3 SCC 270 wherein it has been held that it is not permissible for the Court to go into the relative hardship of the Page 85 of 88 Sub:KVS Tansfer matter 86 employees. It is for the administration to consider the facts of given case and mitigate the real hardship in the interest of good and efficient administration.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt Archana Sharma vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan on 24 February, 2023

11. As far as transfer during mid academic session is concerned, the Court does not have the power to annul the transfer order only on the ground that it will cause personal inconvenience to the employee, his family members and children as consideration of these views fall within the exclusive domain of the employer. If the transfer order is made in mid-academic session of the children of the employee, the Court/Tribunal cannot interfere. It is for the employer to consider such a personal grievance. This aspect has also been considered by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of M.P. vs. S.S. Kaurav (1995) 3 SCC 270 wherein it has been held that it is not permissible for the Court to go into the relative hardship of the Page 85 of 88 Sub:KVS Tansfer matter 86 employees. It is for the administration to consider the facts of given case and mitigate the real hardship in the interest of good and efficient administration.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt Reshma Khan vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan on 24 February, 2023

11. As far as transfer during mid academic session is concerned, the Court does not have the power to annul the transfer order only on the ground that it will cause personal inconvenience to the employee, his family members and children as consideration of these views fall within the exclusive domain of the employer. If the transfer order is made in mid-academic session of the children of the employee, the Court/Tribunal cannot interfere. It is for the employer to consider such a personal grievance. This aspect has also been considered by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of M.P. vs. S.S. Kaurav (1995) 3 SCC 270 wherein it has been held that it is not permissible for the Court to go into the relative hardship of the Page 85 of 88 Sub:KVS Tansfer matter 86 employees. It is for the administration to consider the facts of given case and mitigate the real hardship in the interest of good and efficient administration.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar Rajput vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan on 24 February, 2023

11. As far as transfer during mid academic session is concerned, the Court does not have the power to annul the transfer order only on the ground that it will cause personal inconvenience to the employee, his family members and children as consideration of these views fall within the exclusive domain of the employer. If the transfer order is made in mid-academic session of the children of the employee, the Court/Tribunal cannot interfere. It is for the employer to consider such a personal grievance. This aspect has also been considered by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of M.P. vs. S.S. Kaurav (1995) 3 SCC 270 wherein it has been held that it is not permissible for the Court to go into the relative hardship of the Page 85 of 88 Sub:KVS Tansfer matter 86 employees. It is for the administration to consider the facts of given case and mitigate the real hardship in the interest of good and efficient administration.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next