Sabu Karikkassery vs State Of Kerala
6. Learned counsel appearing for the second
respondent, who is one of the persons who opted to
purchase the flat and who claims to have given Rs.19 Lakhs
opposed this application on the ground that this is a clear
case of cheating done by the petitioner and the second
accused and they should not be let off so easily. It is
pointed out that the second respondent has invested nearly
Rs.19 Lakhs and it does not appear that the project will be
re-started at all, let alone completed. It is pointed out that
they have been deprived of their money and they are left in
the lurch. It is therefore pointed out that anticipatory bail
B.A.5730/2012. 4
may not be granted to the petitioner. Learned counsel also
relied on the decision reported in Saju K.A. V. State of
Kerala (2011(3) KHC 862).