Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.43 seconds)
Documents citing Universal Autocrafts Private Limited & ... vs The Board Of Trustees For The Port on 24 February, 2010

M.P. State Cooperative Ank Mydt. Bhopal vs Shrikant Pandey on 11 September, 2023

The counsel has also placed reliance on the decision of Apex Court in Sidhartha Sarawgi v. board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata and others and Universal Autocrafts Private Limited and another v. Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata and others [(2014) 16 SCC 248] and submits that for the day to day functioning of the Society, the Managing Director can delegate the power and, therefore, in the present case only an authorization was in favour of the Assistant General Manager to file an appeal and there was no infirmity or perversity with the same. Thus counsel submits that the petition deserves to be allowed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - M S Bhatti - Full Document

M.P. State Cooperative Bank Mydt. ... vs Pankaj Kumar Sahu on 11 September, 2023

The counsel has also placed reliance on the decision of Apex Court in Sidhartha Sarawgi v. board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata and others and Universal Autocrafts Private Limited and another v. Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata and others [(2014) 16 SCC 248] and submits that for the day to day functioning of the Society, the Managing Director can delegate the power and, therefore, in the present case only an authorization was in favour of the Assistant General Manager to file an appeal and there was no infirmity or perversity with the same. Thus counsel submits that the petition deserves to be allowed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - M S Bhatti - Full Document

M.P. State Cooperative Bank Mydt. ... vs Murarilal Khatik on 11 September, 2023

The counsel has also placed reliance on the decision of Apex Court in Sidhartha Sarawgi v. board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata and others and Universal Autocrafts Private Limited and another v. Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata and others [(2014) 16 SCC 248] and submits that for the day to day functioning of the Society, the Managing Director can delegate the power and, therefore, in the present case only an authorization was in favour of the Assistant General Manager to file an appeal and there was no infirmity or perversity with the same. Thus counsel submits that the petition deserves to be allowed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - M S Bhatti - Full Document

M.P. State Cooperative Bank Mydt. ... vs Sushil Kumar Kanoongo on 11 September, 2023

The counsel has also placed reliance on the decision of Apex Court in Sidhartha Sarawgi v. board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata and others and Universal Autocrafts Private Limited and another v. Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata and others [(2014) 16 SCC 248] and submits that for the day to day functioning of the Society, the Managing Director can delegate the power and, therefore, in the present case only an authorization was in favour of the Assistant General Manager to file an appeal and there was no infirmity or perversity with the same. Thus counsel submits that the petition deserves to be allowed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - M S Bhatti - Full Document

Mr. Sidhartha Sarawgi vs Board Of Trustees For on 30 March, 2010

According to me, there is an apparent conflict between the decisions in C.O. No. 2423 of 2002, M/s. Om Credit Corporation and another - v - Board of Trustees of The Port of Calcutta and another (unreported) decided by a learned Single Judge of this Court on 11th January 2005 and W.P. No. 767 of 2009, Universal Autocrafts Private Limited & Anr. - v - The Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata & Ors. (unreported) decided by a Single Bench of this Court on 24th February 2010.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - I P Mukerji - Full Document
1